Post# 34

2023-2024 Franchise Review Wrap-Up

December 16, 2023

Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending. Carl Bard

Introduction

This Post will basically wrap up the series of franchise reviews and essays that I attempted in 2023. The teams are listed in order of their 2023 records despite the fact that they were originally being done in order of their 2022 records.

1. Atlanta Braves [2021 World Champions]

2021 Record: 88-73; 2022 Record: 101-61; 2023 Record: 104-58 [First Half: 54-27; Second Half 50-31].

Comment: The Atlanta Braves’ regular season juggernaut continues to roll. The Braves have signed virtually their entire core of young stars (except for Max Fried) to long term contracts. Now they are playing with house money, so to speak. Their first move in the 2024 off-season was quite brilliant. They declined their option to resign 32-year-old left fielder Eddie Rosario, who was their least valuable regular. Then they traded for 24-year-old Jarred Kelenic, a tarnished outfield prospect who has possibly significant upside. Along with Vaughn Grissom, a 22-year-old second baseman who the Braves plan to try in the outfield, this gives them two good options to replace Rosario. Basically, if they had just one more front line starting pitcher, the Braves would be scary good. Even without that ace, the Braves are almost, baring catastrophe, sure to win 100+ games in 2024. With yet another ace, the Braves would have to be the overwhelming favorites to win the 2024 World Series. The only thing that can derail the Braves is probably jealousy. Sooner or later, one or some of the Braves’ players is/are going to get upset about how underpaid they are. Ronald Acuna Jr., who is worth 40 or more million dollars a year on the open market, is getting 17 million dollars a year……..for the next five straight years (assuming the Braves pick up the team options in 2027 and 2028. Sooner or later, that has got to burn. Success Cycle Position: Holding at the Top.

Published Essay [Post# 29; 3rd of 4 actually posted]: How intelligent was the Atlanta Braves decision to tie up their core players long term way before they (hopefully) reach their prime? The conclusion was that it was extremely smart, which seems self-evident.

2. Baltimore Orioles

2021 Record: 52-110; 2022 Record: 83-79; 2023 Record: 101-61 [First Half: 48-33; Second Half: 53-28]

Comment: With Jackson Holliday being added to the Orioles’ collection of young talent, the Orioles are probably not returning to the second division any time soon. The Orioles may be a much better team in 2024 [with another year of experience for their core & the return of John Means to their pitching staff] but still come nowhere close to their 101 win total in 2023. In 2023, the Birdos went 30-16 in games decided by one run and 11-6 in extra innings. The team’s expected record was just 95-67 (which is still pretty good). But it is not hard to envision the team being even better (pitchers John Means and Grayson Rodriguez step up and shortstop Holliday delivers immediately). If it happens, the club could win 90-100 games and, depending on luck, still have improved over 2023. The young Orioles seem to be a very likeable team; it is unfortunate that their owner, technically Peter Angelos but in reality his nepo son John Angelos, seems to be a complete douchebag. In the middle of the Orioles’ breakout year, he decided to shake down the city of Baltimore for a new Stadium/Retail area and lied that he would not be able to pay all these suddenly successful players. Hopefully the City of Baltimore tells this jerkwad to go pound sand. Success Cycle Position: Still rising to the top despite 101 wins.

Unpublished Essay: Is Adley Rustchman the most likely future Hall of Famer from the current Major League catching corps? Where have all the Johnny Bench type catchers gone?

3. Los Angeles Dodgers

2021 Record: 106-56; 2022 Record: 111-51; 2023 Record: 100-62 [First Half: 46-35; Second Half: 54-27].

Comment: Can the Los Angeles Dodger’s streak of 100 win seasons survive the complete decimation of their pitching staff? Is this the curse of Trevor Bauer? Has any MLB team ever basically lost their complete starting core to injury (or other circumstances) during a single season? It is a miracle that the Dodgers still won 100 games (on the nose). In fact, they had the best second half record in 2023; before collapsing in the play-offs. It was like watching a winded marathon runner fall down with the finish tape in sight. Interestingly, the Dodgers’ entire 2023-2024 off-season seems predicated on whether the great pitcher/DH Shohei Ohtani will end up doing what seems like the most completely logical thing to do: sign with the crosstown Dodgers, sticking it to the doomed Los Angeles Angels, while maintaining Ohtani’s easiest access to his motherland, Japan. It seems to make way too much sense to not happen, except for the fact that the Dodgers desperately need pitching and Shohei cannot throw the ball in anger again until 2025. Will the Dodgers become the first team to win at least 100 games in a season four straight years? The odds right now have to be a quite a bit less than 50/50 for another 100 victory year. Success Cycle Position: Trying to fight off the downward slide from the Top.

*After writing this part of the post, Shohei Ohtani did sign with the LA Dodgers on December 9, 2023. Their position on the Success Cycle is officially upgraded to: Trying to get through 2024 until returning to the Top of the Cycle.

Published Essay [Post #25; 1st of 4 already posted]: An essay in 2 parts about the Dodgers; Part #1 -The history of Super Teams or will the Dodgers be the firs team to win 100 or more games in 4 straight seasons; and Part #2 – When will a LA Dodger hit 50 home runs in a season.*

*If life is good, Shohei Ohtani will almost certainly become the first Dodger to hit 50 HRs.

4. Tampa Bay Rays

2021 Record: 100-62; 2022 Record: 86-76; 2023 Record: 99-63 [First Half: 54-27; Second Half: 45-36].

Comment: One has to wonder how much longer the Tampa Bay Rays team can continue to defy gravity and usually field a winning team. From 2008 to 2013,* the Rays finished above .500 [after starting their team history with 10 straight losing seasons from1998 to 2007]. Then Tampa Bay fielded 4 more losers from 2014 to 2017 [though twice finishing just 80-82]. Currently, the Rays are on another six consecutive years winning streak [2018-2023]. They are definitely a smarter organization than most of the other Major League teams. But the Rays are not the Dodgers or Yankees. The Rays do not have the financial resources to buy top-of-the-line free agents or cover over their mistakes. The brain drain out of the Tampa front office is almost constant (of course the Dodgers are run by a Ray Alumni). Sooner or later, it seems that the organization will make a misstep and the club will crash down. Perhaps the current Wander Franco debacle is the warning bell for the end of this near constant success cycle? One of the odder stories of 2023 was the Tampa Bay Rays announcing that they were going to stay put and build a new stadium & entertainment area right where they are in St. Petersburg (following the very successful models of the Atlanta Braves, St. Louis Cardinals, and other teams). But this came after years and years of saying that their present stadium site was completely hopeless and they needed to move. The lesson seems to be that no one should ever believe a single thing a Major League club says when they are trying to get hundreds of millions of dollars gifted to them by their local government. Success Cycle Position: Teetering on the edge of a downhill crash.

*Curiously, the Rays first winning season, 2008, coincided with dropping the Devil from their team name, becoming just the Rays rather than Devil Rays.

Unpublished Essay: The usually sad history of the modern practice of signing young players with very little to no Major League service time to a long-term contract [or was signing the Wander Franco a mistake?].

5. Milwaukee Brewers

2021 Record: 95-67; 2022 Record: 86-76; 2023 Record: 92-70 [First Half: 43-38; Second Half: 49-32.

Comment: Bud Selig, owner of the Milwaukee Brewers from 1970 to 2004, usually maintained that the Milwaukee team could not compete because of the way Baseball’s finances were structured. Rather than figure out a way to run the Brewers so that they could compete, Selig became the Commissioner and reorganized the economic structure of the Major Leagues so that: 1) any poorly run team could be profitable without even competing; and/or 2) any team that was efficiently run could at the very least compete with a boom or bust strategy [i.e. building up a strong core to compete and then tearing the core down when it aged out of being competitive]. Mark Attanasio, the man who succeeded Selig as the Brewer owner, has played this game pretty well. His team has usually had a winning record [11 seasons over .500, 7 seasons under .500, and 1 season of 81-81]. Does he still send Selig thank you cards? At the present, it would most probably be best for the Milwaukee Brewers to go into a rebuilding phase. Every really good team needs to be built on the backs of a few superstars. Milwaukee’s two best players, Christian Yelich and Corbin Burnes, are both no longer building blocks for the Brewers. It is very unlikely that Yelich will ever regain his 2018-2019 MVP form; and Burnes will be a free agent in 2025 and the chances that he resigns with the Brewers are slim and none. Success Cycle Position: Obviously on the Downhill slope, do they try a soft reboot or a full rebuild?

Unpublished Essay: Was part of Bud Selig’s legacy the complete erasure of Anti-Semitism in Baseball (well, maybe not complete as Anti-Semitism always seems to be lurking)? In other news, Baseball has gone Hollywood.

6t. Houston Astros [2022 World Champions]

2021 Record: 95-67; 2022 Record: 106-56; 2023 Record: 90-72 [First Half: 44-37; Second Half: 46-35].

Comment: The Astros made a spirited try at defending their crown but finally lost to the eventual Champion Texas Rangers. Will this be the true beginning of a New York Yankees/Boston Red Sox or Los Angeles Dodgers/San Francisco Giants franchise blood feud? Probably not. The Rangers still seem to be on the way up while the Astros are probably on the way down. But Astro owner Jim Crane will surely try to gear his Astros up for yet another run for the Roses in 2024. Jose Altuve [34 in 2024] and Alex Bregman [30] are in the last years of their contracts. Jose Abreu [37 in 2024] and Justin Verlander [41 in 2024] are past their expiration date. But, even if all these players leave or retire, the Astros will still have a formidable hitting core [Jordan Alvarez, Kyle Tucker & Yanier Diaz] going forward. Of course, much of whether the eventual rebuild and reset will simply rely on pitcher attrition. The great pitching staff of the 2022 World Champions broke down quite a bit in 2023. Christian Javier was no longer an ace; Framber Valdez lost his mojo mid-season after throwing his no-hitter; and the relief pitchers were no longer the it’s lights out crew of the previous year. It will also be interesting to see if the retirement of Dusty Baker has any noticeable effect in 2024. Whether it does or not, the fact that the Astro’s 2022 World Championship propelled Johnnie B. Baker into the Hall of Fame without any question marks will still stand. One last thing (simply from a Baseball fans’ perspective), it would be wonderful if Yordan Alvarez [27 in 2024] could play a full season uninjured. Success Cycle Position: Orbit slowly decaying, atmospheric reentry imminent, eventual soft landing or complete crash coming, but which is debatable.

Published Essay [Post#28; 2nd of 4 actually posted]: What kind of writer puts three different subjects (1. Astros’ Corporate culture, 2. Hall of Fame chances of Jose Abreau, and 3. Dusty Baker’s Clubhouse influence) into what was just supposed to be a short essay?

6t. Philadelphia Phillies

2021 Record: 82-80; 2022 Record: 87-75; 2023 Record: 90-72 [First Half: 43-38; Second Half: 47-34].

Comment: If there is a God in Heaven, the Los Angeles Angels will trade Mike Trout to the Philadelphia Phillies. And then Trout will sip from the elixir of life and once again begin playing 150 games or so per season, bringing multiple Championships to Philadelphia [Trout grew up in the New Jersey suburbs of the Philadelphia metropolitan area]. Trout or no Trout, Dave Drombowski will probably find a way to eventually bring a World Championship to the Phillies. In some ways, he is the most interesting General Manager in the Game. He has a vision of the type of position players that he wants, the type of pitching staff that he wants to build, and a single minded focus on building the team without worrying too much about making mistakes. Drombrowski will keep throwing shit against the wall until it sticks. It remains to be seen whether one of the odder news stories of the off-season have any effect on the team chemistry. That would be Bryce Harper’s odd bitching and moaning about his contract status. Harper has obviously had second thoughts about his strange signing of an extremely long contract with no opt-outs that right now seems to undervalue his services substantially. Of course, if his career ends today or tomorrow, there will be no give backs to the Phillies either. One wonders who does his publicity? Better that those complaints were lodged privately, not publicly. The Phillies, at least, seemed to have done the intelligent thing and simply ignored them. Success Cycle Position: Still bubbling under the Top, waiting for the magic to strike.

Unpublished Essay: Has Dave Drombrowski outsmarted the the philosophy of Moneyball; or is he simply applying it (seeking undervalued assets) in his own way (or is it just that nobody can really value defense correctly)?

6t. Texas Rangers [2023 World Champions]

2021 Record: 60-102; 2022 Record: 68-94; 2023 Record: 90-72 [First Half: 49-32; Second Half: 41-40].

Comment: The 2023 World Champion Texas Rangers had their season unfold like a play. In the prologue, the mood was grim as the lead actor went down with an injury that would knock him out for the duration. In the first act, the play was a roaring success, the toast of Broadway. In the second act, the club struggled mightily and was briefly upstaged by another long-running and far more popular play which seemed primed to take the post season awards. In the third and final act, the acting company roared back to sweep the awards and spit in the faces of their critics. How good would the Rangers have been if Jacob DeGrom had been able to pitch? In 2024, they will finally get their ace on the mound (but for how long, no one knows). Perhaps in 2024, the Rangers may finally get some good news on Jack Leiter and/or Kumar Rocker [drated #2 overall in 2021 & #3 overall in 2022 respectively]. Regardless, the Rangers may be even better in 2024 simply by having their best player, Corey Seager, and best rookie, Evan Carter, play the entire season (not to mention Josh Jung). And, of course, that doesn’t even mention Wyatt Langford (#4 overall in 2023) and blasting away in the minors like it is his mission to debut in the Majors within just a year of being drafted. The Ranger’s future certainly seems bright. On the other hand, if you are not so impressed by the Ranger’s success, you can always watch the Documentary: Throw a Billion Dollars from the Helicopter. This film shows the Government of Arlington County, Texas, simply giving away, supposedly without any pay-offs or promptings, a new stadium to the Texas Ranger owners in 2020. Success Cycle Position: The Rangers are peaking while their opponents are fading. With a little luck, the Rangers will rule the AL West for the next five years or so.

Unpublished Essay: Are there limits to how many strikeouts one pitcher can throw or how many home runs one batter can hit (or can a Baseball player strike out more than 400 hitters or bash much more than 60 home runs in a season)?

9. Toronto Blue Jays

2021 Record: 91-71; 2022 Record: 92-70; 2023 Record: 89-73 [First Half: 44-37; Second Half: 45-36].

Comment: The Toronto Blue Jays are very much on the clock. The team’s two home grown star players, Bo Bichette and Vlad Guerrero, Jr. will both be free agents after the 2025 season. The Jays were unable to sign either of them to long-term team-friendly contracts early on in their careers. Since both players are the sons of former Major League stars, this is pretty understandable. They will, almost surely, be maximizing their value in the free agent marketplace of 2026. Thus, the Blue Jays have the next two seasons, 2024 and 2025, to make hay while the sun is still shining. Toronto seems to be a well-run team. After coming up with two potential superstar players in Guerrero and Bichette, the Blue Jays proceeded to construct a very good team to support them. The Jays did this the old-fashioned way: some good trades but mostly by free agency. Of course, the free agents that Toronto signed to add to their 2 homegrown stars and put them over the top (George Springer, Kevin Gausman, Brandon Belt, Chris Bassitt, Whitt Merrifeild, Yusei Kikuchi, Hyun Jin Ryu et al) are all on the down slope of their careers (and now 3B Matt Chapman is gone). At this moment, the Blue Jays need to go all in and take their shot at the Gold (and the Jays obviously know this as their failed pursuit of Shohei Ohtani shows). Hopefully, they get one really good post-season run going in 2024 or 2025 because they may face the abyss in 2026 (after Bichette and Guerrero leave and their supporting free agent core’s careers begin to time out). Success Cycle Position: The time is now and the Blue Jays know it (and it would really help if Vlad Junior returned to form).

Published Essay: Is Vlad Junior on the road to ruin? A history of hefty players going from Dave Orr to Prince Fielder to Vlad Junior himself.

10. Seattle Mariners

2021 Record: 90-72; 2022 Record: 90-72; 2023 Record: 88-74 [First Half: 39-42; Second Half: 49-32].

Comment: Since their first season in 1977, the Seattle Mariners’ franchise has been blessed with some of the greatest Baseball Players of modern times (Ken Griffey Jr., Ichiro Suzuki, Alex Rodiguez [A-Rod] and Randy Johnson at the top, but also Edgar Martinez and Felix Hernandez). Despite all of this talent, not a single Mariners team has ever even appeared in a World Series. If there is any justice, that fate will not befall Julio Rodriguez [J-Rod?], the franchise’s latest superstar. Rodriguez will play the 2024 season at just 23 years old. His 2023 season looked a lot like is rookie season, 2022. In fact, it doesn’t look like he improved at all. But under the hood of his 2023 season, there is some proof that J-Rod actually has a chance to be just as good as Griffey Junior, Ichiro, or perhaps even A-Rod without steroids. Basically, Julio had a mediocre season in 2023 except for a blazing hot month of August that brought his statistics in line with his 2022 rookie year. Hitting just a mediocre .245 in the rest of 2023, Rodriguez was on nuclear fire in August, hitting for a .429 batting average and a .724 slugging percentage. At one point, Rodriguez even had 17 hits in four games, making only 5 outs. After the All Star break, Julio actually had a .308 BA and a .578 SA. If Rodriguez could simply maintain those post-All-Star stats for a whole season, he will be a superstar and one of the top players in all of Baseball. But his insane August 2023 numbers imply that there is even more in the tank. And the way to unlock all this talent is already apparent. All Julio Rodriguez needs to do to totally harness his talents is to learn to control the strike zone. Of course, that is easier said than done. The history of Baseball is littered with the career corpses of batters who could not improve their strike zone recognition even one little bit. Success Cycle Position: Waiting for Julio to blossom while they should be building his veteran support.

Unpublished Essay: Would Ichiro Suzuki have broken Pete Rose’s career hits record if Ichiro had played his whole career in the States?

11. Minnesota Twins

2021 Record: 73-89; 2022 Record: 78-84; 2023 Record: 87-75 [First Half: 40-41; Second Half: 47-34].

Comment: Just five seasons ago [2019], the Twins exploded on the AL Central, improving from 78-84 to 101-61 in Rocco Baldelli’s first year as the Minnesota Field Manager. The Twinkies were a great hitting team, bashing a record 307 homers that year (though that was the top rabbit ball season of all time). The core was young and the farm was good. The Twinkies seemed to be entering into an extremely competitive phase. In the covid wiped out season of 2020, the Twinkies were still good, finishing 36-24 (.600 Pct) which translates into a normal record of about 97-65. But then this emerging Twinkie Dynasty seems to have swerved off the road, got lost in the grass, and run out of gas. What happened? Some Young players did not develop [Gabe Kapler and Miguel Sano]. Injuries were a large part of it [Byron Buxton]. Some core players were already old [Nelson Cruz]. Players were traded away [Eddie Rosario, Mitch Garver and, of course, Luis Arraez]. Various players arrived, added very little, and then left [Andrelton Simmons and Joey Gallo]. The pitchers were pretty much just average when the team needed an ace [which trading Arraez finally got them). After two seasons of wallowing in the second division, the Twinks had a good year last year by simply signing enough player depth to cover for their injury prone regulars. The question now is: where do the Twins go from here? Their opportunity to take over the AL Central in 2021 and 2022 is gone. Do they contend or rebuild? The team has it’s new superstar (Carlos Correa) and ace (Pablo Lopez) to build on. And, of course, they play in the mediocre AL Central. The Twins should be all in. Success Cycle Position: Should be going for the Gold but the Twinkies usually find a way to trip themselves up.

Unpublished Essay: Can just reading consistently about another Baseball team than the one you grew up rooting for make you a fan of that team? As they say, your mileage may vary but my Twin train was nothing but flat tires. [The Miami Marlins essay is the companion piece to this one.]

12t. Arizona Diamondbacks

2021 Record: 52-110; 2022 Record: 74-88; 2023 Record: 84-78 [First Half: 48-33; Second Half: 36-45].

Comment: The Diamondbacks, much like the Texas Rangers team that they played and lost to in the World Series, faded badly down the stretch. If they had played their first half like their second half, the Serpents wouldn’t have even made the playoffs [72-90 pace]. For some reason, 2023 was a bad year for momentum. That being said, Arizona may be much better in 2024. Their superstar in waiting, Corbin Carroll, will have another year of growth. Their once and future shortstop Jordan Lawler will play the whole season. Brandon Pfaadt may mature into a third ace pitcher for the team. Perhaps even Druw Jones [#2 overall pick in 2022] will begin to show signs of life. No matter how you slice it, they have come a long way since the club’s 2021 disaster. All that being said, I rooted hard against the Diamondbacks in the World Series for one simple reason. The Snakes, formed in 1998, amazingly won the World Series just three years later in 2001 (perhaps even more odd, the Serpents went 65-97 in their first year of existence and then improved to 100-62 in their 2nd season). This early success seemed unwarranted (even though, for the last 20 years, the Snakes have been basically mediocre). On the other hand, the Texas Rangers had never won a World Series in their existence (in Texas or their previous existence as the second Washington Senators team from 1961 to 1971). For just this reason, I rooted for the Rangers. Success Cycle Position: Trending up to regular contention absent injuries or stupidity.

Unpublished Essay: Is Baseball being taken over by the godchildren of Roy Campanella? Biracial Baseball players are becoming an ever larger part of Baseball demographics.

12t. Miami Marlins

2021 Record: 67-95; 2022 Record: 69-93; 2023 Record: 84-78 [First Half: 47-34; Second Half: 37-44].

Comment: The primary story of the Miami Marlins’ 20223 season was how the team had made the progressive move of hiring a female General Manager to run the organization, Kim Ng. This hiring had to be rated as an unqualified success. The Marlins improved from 69-93 to 84-78 in her two years at the helm. Then things got weird. Rather than bask in the glory of not only being the first Major League team to be run by a female GM but to have that GM do well, the Marlins effectively demoted her for a her good work. Of course, Kim Ng could have continued as the Marlin GM, but she was going to be demoted nevertheless. Way back in the beginning, Baseball team owners directly ran their teams. Then some of these owners hired Managers to help them run the club. Sometimes the Manager (also called the Captain) was just a player who ran the team on the field. But sometimes these Managers were businessman who also did the scheduling, collected the money, and moonlighted as field Managers. In time, this was all sorted out to the modern hierarchy of Owner, General Manager, and Field Manager. Recently, however, there has been yet another division of Duties. Many Major League teams are now are set up with an Owner, the President (of Baseball Operations), the General Manager, and a Field Manager. Under this structure, the President of Baseball Operations (or whatever) actually is the General Manager and builds the team. The General Manger no longer builds the team but still does all the grunt work that GMs have always done (basically the paperwork). To her credit, Kim Ng resigned the minute she knew that the Marlins were bringing in a President of Baseball operations for 2024. Success Cycle Position: Hopefully headed right back to the bottom where they belong.

Unpublished Essay: How do I hate thee? For the entire existence of the Miami Marlins franchise, they have have been the closest Major League team to my home. Despite this, the Miami Marlins have always been, no contest, my least favorite team. In 2023, they gave me one more reason to despise them.

14. Chicago Cubs

2021 Record: 71-91; 2022 Record: 74-88; 2023 Record: 83-79 [First Half: 38-43; Second Half: 45-36].

Comment: The Cubs are making steady progress climbing back up the hill of success. Their is a good chance that they will make the playoffs in 2024 (they played at a 90-72 pace in the second half). Of course, the Cubbies compete in the National League Central and, ever since the adoption of the three division set-up by both Leagues [East, Central, West], the two Central divisions usually have been the weakest. Except for perhaps the St. Louis Cardinals, no Central Division team in either League has been able to build anything resembling a dynasty. The main reason for this appears to be the owners of these Central Division clubs. Overall these owners seem to be both more conservative and also cheaper than their Eastern and Western Division brethren. Although the Cubs are once again on the path that led to their 2016 World Championship, the question will once again be whether the Cubs’ owners, the Ricketts family, will pay to maintain the team at altitude. A good litmus test for this question will be if the Cubbies resign Cody Bellinger. Bellinger was the best hitter on the 2023 Cubs but comes with substantial risk. Are the injuries that wrecked his career from 2020 to 2022 really healed for good? Was his 2023 season his new talent level or is their any chance that he could return to his 2019 MVP form [47 HR, 115 RBI, .305 BA]. A conservative club signs Bellinger like the Cubs did in 2023 (one year prove-it-to-me contract). A club going for broke signs a player like Bellinger for the long-term. Something tells me that, when the Cubbies look at Cody Bellinger, they see Kris Bryant (and his completely disastrous contract for the Rockies). Success Cycle Position: Rising towards the Top but in a balloon ready to pop.

Unpublished Essay: How good can outfielder Seiya Suzuki be now that he has established himself in the Major Leagues? Many Japanese pitchers have made the transition but few Japanese position players have.

15t. Cincinnati Reds

2021 Record: 83-79; 2022 Record: 62-100; 2023 Record: 82-80 [First Half: 43-38; Second Half: 39-42].

Comment: Like the Chicago Cubs, the Cincinnati Reds are poised in 2024 to jump back into contention. Also like the Cubbies, they play in the weak NL Central. And, like their AL Central Counterpart, the Cleveland Guardians, the Baseball Gods just gifted an undeserved high Draft pick on the Reds for 2024. It must just be an Ohio kind of year (the Reds will pick at #2 when they should have picked 13th and the Guardians, who got the #1, should have picked 9th). The nuts and bolts of another Big Red Machine are here; they just have to be assembled properly. Without question, there is one huge difference. The Big Red Machine of the mid-1970s never had a potential pitching ace like Hunter Greene. Of course, it is also quite unlikely that these Reds will approach the savagery of the Big Red Machine’s offensive attack. The year 2024 will also almost surely be the first year since 2007 without Joey Votto on the roster. As Baseball History unfolds, the likelihood of a player spending his whole career with just one team recedes. Is this really a bad thing? Baseball, after all, is a job for the players at its core. Nobody would put in the amount of time and effort it takes to perform in the Major Leagues without pay. It is certainly a bit old-fashioned to hope that Votto and others like him never have to move. So why does it feel right and would you want to reward it somehow? Success Cycle Position: Trending up with the sky as the limit and the hard ground as a floor.

Unpublished Essay: Does Elly de la Cruz (or perhaps Oneil Cruz) represent the ultimate whippet-thin but also wiry-strong Baseball position player (an essay about players in the field with zero percent body fat)?

15t. New York Yankees

2021 Record: 92-70; 2022 Record: 99-63; 2023 Record: 82-80 [First Half: 45-36; Second Half: 37-44].

Comment: The hysteria that followed the Yankees mediocre 2023 season was certainly a sight to behold. Despite being plagued with injury after injury, the Yankees fought through the first half of 2023 in good shape (on their way to a 90 win season and probable play-off berth). However, in the second half, the continuous flood of even more injuries capsized the H.M.S. Yankee. Outfielder Jasson Dominguez was the perfect 2023 Yankee. This top prospect, called up to try to salvage the season, played fantastically well until almost immediately blowing out his elbow and requiring “Tommy John” surgery. A normal team would just write a season like this off and hope to rebound the next year. But these are the Yankees. They won’t be able to shrug it off. In some ways, this disastrous season is bad luck for other teams. The Yankees will double down now, and probably sign both a top-flight pitcher and hitter. With normal luck, this would already be a good team. With reinforcements, the Yankees will be, once again, the Yankees.* The Yankees, like few other teams (Dodgers, Mets, Red Sox, probably both Chicago teams) need to adopt a modern strategy that makes them continuously successful. In other words, the Yankees should treat the lesser teams in the Major Leagues like their farm system. Use free agency to collect the other teams home grown stars and superstars so that the Yanks never have a losing season. If they had been all in on this strategy recently, the Yankees would probably have Bryce Harper in their line-up too (maybe a run at Mike Trout is now in the cards too). Success Cycle Position: Returning to the Top, their normal position.

*Two days after this was written, the Yanks traded for supposed outfielder but fantastic hitter Juan Soto. Who’s next: Yoshinobu Yamamoto, the ace of Japan?

Unpublished Essay: What are the chances that Aaron Judge’s 10 year contract has a happy ending (or a history of how really tall Baseball players, hitters not pitchers, age)?

15t. San Diego Padres

2021 Record: 79-83; 2022 Record: 89-73; 2023 Record: 82-80 [First Half: 37-44; Second Half: 45-36].

Comment: With the death of the Padres’ owner, Peter Seidler, it is obvious that the Padres will have to reset. However, the late Mr. Sielder should be given his proper due for trying to go out in a blaze of glory. One assumes that the Padres planned to spend every dime that they received in 2023 and that they included the projected revenue from a good post-season run (and possibly even World Series appearance) in their budget. Of course, the Friars were a complete disappointment in 2023 and didn’t even make the play-offs. After the season, the Padres were forced to take out a 50 million dollar loan. There is probably a good chance that the projected revenue from a deep run into the play-offs was about 50 million dollars. Peter Seidler, we salute you. The loading up of mercenary baseball talent by the 2023 Padres to make a run at a World Championship reminds me of the 1997 Florida (now Miami) Marlins. But the Marlins actually won the World Series that year. Perhaps the difference between the two teams was the GMs who collected the talent. In 1997, the Florida GM was Dave Drombowski, a man who seems to have the odd talent of building cohesive teams with a distinct competitive identity. For the 2023 SD Padres, the GM was one A.J. Preller who seems to have the team building skills of any cold-blooded management consultant. Another major difference was the Owners. Florida was owned by Wayne Huizenga, basically a corporate thug executing a cold blooded strategy; while the Padres were owned by Peter Seidler, who wanted to give his city a trophy before he died. That the bad guy won while the good guy failed utterly makes you question the existence of God himself. Success Cycle Position: Probably into the Abyss though that doesn’t preclude the possibility of a 90-72 season leading up to an appearance in the 2024 World Series.

Unpublished Essay: Should Yu Darvish’s combined Japanese/Major League statistics qualify him for the Baseball Hall of Fame (or a history of Japanese pitchers in the Big Leagues)?

18. San Francisco Giants

2021 Record: 107-55; 2022 Record: 81-81; 2023 Record: 79-83 [First Half: 45-36; Second Half: 34-47].

Comment: The National League San Francisco Giants have been stuck in the middle for the last two years (along with the American League’s Los Angeles Angels and Boston Red Sox). In modern Baseball, teams are either competing or tanking. Being stuck in the middle is like being stuck in Hell. The team can either compete to appease the fans or rebuild to compete. To go 81-81 or so, year after year, is the epitome of bad strategy. Since 2018, the SF Giants have gone 73-89 [2018], 77-85 [2019], 29-31 [covid 2020], 81-81 [2022], and 79-83 [2023]. But, in 2021, the Giants went an incredible 107-55, one of the greatest stone cold fluke Baseball seasons of all time. For the last two seasons [2022 & 2023], the Giants have tried to recapture that 2021 magic. But the alchemy of that year, players up and down the roster having career years maybe because they were well rested from the covid canceled 2020 season, was gone. Even having said that, the Giants did recapture some of the magic briefly in 2023. The team was on it’s way to a 90-72 record at the end of the first half before collapsing in the second half. Interestingly, the club decided to keep the GM who constructed these teams (Farhan Zaidi) rather than the Field Manager (Gabe Kapler) who got the last dregs out of their talent. Time will tell if that was a good choice. Success Cycle Position: Still stuck in the middle, attempts to land a superstar to lead them out of the wilderness have failed.

Unpublished Essay: How do you best handle an older Ballplayer? The king of all my unpublished essays has to be the one on the effects of aging; inspired by the improbable 2021 San Francisco Giants’ season.

19t. Boston Red Sox

2021 Record: 92-70; 2022 Record: 78-84; 2023 Record: 78-84 [First Half: 40-41; Second Half: 38-43]

Comment: There are currently quite a few Baseball teams owned by financial investment businessmen types (basically hedge fund managers). The Boston Red Sox owner, John Henry, was one of the first (if not the first). The Red Sox, for the last several years, have been run in a hedge fund manner (attempting to extract maximum value from minimal investment). The result has been two identical 78-84 last place finishes in the American League East for 2022 and 2023. The team philosophy seems to be to sign a random bunch of talent, hope that luck ignites them to a great season (which actually happened in both 2013 and 2021 for Boston) and then reset to try it again if that doesn’t work. But counting on getting lucky may not be the best strategy. The Red Sox explicitly hired Chaim Bloom, their General Manager from 2020 to 2023, to rebuild the team’s tattered farm system while also trying to put together a Championship team from random scraps. For hedge fund managers like John Henry, trying to game the system, acquiring talent by being smarter than the other teams and winning on the margins, is second nature. There were some indications that Bloom was actually pulling the first part of his mandate off. The BoSox system, other than a lack of pitchers, is in much better shape. But the patience of the fans, and the club itself, wore off and Bloom got the ax. Now his successor gets to begin with a good farm system and a mandate to spend money to make money. It hardly seems fair. Success Cycle Position: Trying to avoid the most dreaded outcome: Stuck in the middle, not going up or down.

Unpublished Essay: Would only drafting position players be a viable draft strategy? Since pitchers’ careers get derailed by injuries far more often than position players, a team could theoretically use its draft picks only on hitters and use the excess hitting talent produced to trade for established pitchers (while also building their pitching staff through free agency).

19t. Detroit Tigers

2021 Record: 77-85; 2022 Record: 66-96; 2023 Record: 78-84 [First Half: 35-46; Second Half: 43-38]

Comment: The Detroit Tigers, like the Chicago Cubs, are another team on the upswing. Their second half record [for a 86-76 pace] seems to indicate that the Tigers may have a winning record in 2024, their first since 2016. They are finally rid of the dead weight of Miguel Cabrera’s career. The club has several hitters who may make a leap forward [Riley Greene, Spencer Torkelson, Kerry Carpenter] and pitchers with promise [Tarik Skubal, Matt Manning, and Reese Olsen] with a bunch of talent bubbling in their farm system [led by outfielder Max Clark]. A return to some semblance of career norms by the highly-paid, but completely underperforming, shortstop Javier Baez would help too. One of the interesting facets of being a long-term Baseball fan is that the depth of your knowledge about other teams, rather than the club whose flannels you actually root for [Red Sox], can give you somewhat of a rooting interest in that other team too. For instance, I would prefer that the Detroit Tigers, with their long and storied history, do better than a team such as the Colorado Rockies, Miami Marlins, or the Arizona Diamondbacks (all created within my lifetime). Success Cycle Position: Coming back into Contention as long as injuries and bad luck don’t drive them into the ditch.

Unpublished Essay: Has any Major League Baseball team lost more potential dynasties than the Detroit Tigers (looking back at the Cobb Tigers, the 1960s Tiger clubs, and the Tiger teams of the 1980s).

21t. Cleveland Guardians

2021 Record: 80-82; 2022 Record: 92-70; 2023 Record: 76-86 [First Half: 39-42; Second Half: 37-44].

Comment: The Cleveland franchise has come a long way since the film Major League used them to represent ineptitude in the 1980s. In the 1990s, the club had a decade of success when the Cleveland farm system churned out great hitters like popcorn. After a relatively quiet decade+ from 2002 to 2012 (with just two 90 win seasons), Cleveland had quite a run of success from the years 2013 to 2022 [9 winning seasons and one year of 80-82, 6 seasons with over 90 wins, one with over 100, and a 2016 World Series appearance in which they lost to the Chicago Cubs. The two constants in this run of excellence were 3B Jose Ramirez and Manager Terry Francona [In Francona’s first year, 2013, the team improved from 68-94 to 92-70]. But, in 2023, Francona retired and the team had their worst season since 2012. Although Cleveland still has a pretty good team, they are lacking one crucial component: power hitting. It would seem like the team was primed to go through a down cycle. However, luck may just be on Cleveland’s side. Under the old Draft system, Cleveland would have picked 9th or 10th in 2024. But, under the new Draft system, Cleveland has come up aces and, with extreme good fortune, gets to choose first. As one of the more likeable Major League franchises, it will be good if they get to pick the Big Bopper of their dreams. Success Cycle Position: Obviously on the Down Side but perhaps with a quick bounce back.

Published Essay: Should you try to erase the past in retrograde (or how does the Cleveland franchise name change from Indians to Guardians look one year later? Should Sports teams bow to the politically correct undertow of current culture?

21t. Pittsburgh Pirates

2021 Record:; 2022 Record:; 2023 Record: 76-86 [First Half: 39-42; First Half: 37-44].

Comment: The Pirates blasted out of the gate in 2023, going 20-8 in their first 28 games. Then they slowly fell back to Earth, finishing 56-78 to arrive at their final record of 76-86. This was their 20th losing season (out of 24 years from 2000-2023) in the 21st Century. It must be a hopeless feeling to root for the Pirates. But there could be good things coming. Pitcher Paul Skenes (the #1 overall 2023 draft pick) is on his way. Second baseman Termarr Johnson (#4 overall in 2022) is certainly interesting (.244 BA but 18 HRs and 101 BBs in 105 games for a .422 on-base percentage). He seems to be some mutant form of Joe Morgan. And Henry Davis (#1 overall in 2021) has established himself in the Major Leagues. If two of these three players become superstar players & also franchise cornerstones, the Pirates may finally become relevant again (the Buccos have the #9 pick overall in 2024 too). Until then, the Pirates can bring back Andrew McCutchen for yet another year in a feel good move. The Bucs have a bunch of players who could be a pretty good supporting cast for some superstars [such as shortstop Oneil Cruz, who could still become a superstar himself, third baseman Ke’Bryan Hayes, OFs Bryan Reynolds & Jack Suwinski, and pitcher Mitch Keller. Success Cycle Position: Definitely on the upswing to contention. But will the Pirates follow the Atlanta Braves model and sign any of this talent to team friendly contracts? Only time will tell…but past Pirates decisions about large contracts do not lean toward hope.

Unpublished Essay: Which Major League Baseball team, so far, has been the worst of the 21st Century? The Pittsburgh Pirates have a good argument that its them. Where do they go from here? A look at their own past (and also the City of Pittsburgh itself) may help. [Companion essay to Kansas City Royals.]

23. New York Mets

2021 Record: 77-85; 2022 Record: 101-61; 2023 Record: 75-87 [First Half: 36-45; Second Half: 39-42].

Comment: New York Met Owner Steve Cohen made his money as a successful Hedge Fund manager. The 2023 season illustrated that Cohen, as he should, understands the financial concept of ‘Sunk Costs’ [i.e. money that has already been spent & cannot be recovered by throwing more money at the problem]. After signing two ancient (by Baseball’s reckoning) pitchers to try to lead the New York Mets back to the Promised Land (play-offs), Cohen did a complete about face when it became apparent that the Mets weren’t going to make it. With the jettison of Billy Eppler as GM and the hiring of David Stearns to run the team, it is apparent that the NY Mets have gone into long-term strategy mode. With a very committed owner and a presumably talented front office, the Mets reset should be short. Eventually, Steve Cohen will open his wallet and once again go for broke to bring a pennant. But it certainly doesn’t feel like 2024 will be the year. Success Cycle Position: The Mets are probably in a short term trough.

Published Essay [Post #31; 4th of 4 actually posted]: What makes for a great Baseball team owner from the fans’ perspective (or is Steve Cohen currently the best Major League Baseball owner)?

24. Los Angeles Angels

2021 Record: 77-85; 2022 Record: 73-89; 2023 Record: 73-89 [First Half: 44-37; Second Half: 29-52]

Comment: With the loss of Shohei Ohtani, the Angels should now go into full tank mode. Odds are extremely good that the 2024 season will be a 100 loss year for the LA Halos. Whether the team keeps or trades their remaining star, Mike Trout, will indicate whether the Angels understand their need to rebuild. In all probability, the Angels will not trade Trout because being stuck in the middle, too good to fail but not good enough to succeed, has been a team mantra for quite some time. Strangely enough, the dumping of seven players on the waiver wire at the end of 2023 would normally be considered a good sign. It got the Angels under the Luxury tax and cleared the decks. It was an unusually intelligent and savvy move for this franchise. But they have already stated that they will definitely not be trading Trout this off-season. Of course, the history of Baseball is littered with similar proclamations that proved to be completely false. But the very statement shows that the Angel front office has not learned a thing. They didn’t trade Ohtani when they should have and will not trade Trout before all his value is gone either. Even if Mike Trout returns in 2024 and plays 150 games or so, he will just be leading the team to another 70 or so loss season. While good for Trout, it will just keep the Angels on the endless treadmill of mediocrity. Success Cycle Position: The Angels are stuck in Neutral when they should be racing to a full rebuild.

Unpublished Essay: Who were Baseball’s greatest athletes decade by decade? Not necessarily the best at playing Baseball, but the most naturally physically gifted specimens of each ten year bloc.

25t. St. Louis Cardinals

2021 Record: 90-72; 2022 Record: 93-69; 2023 Record: 71-91 [First Half: 34-47; Second Half: 37-44].

Comment: The St. Louis Cardinals have apparently decided to test whether Baseball’s front office strategies from before the Moneyball revolution should be brought back. A few years back, the Cardinals were on the cutting edge of modern Baseball analytical strategy. Among others, the Cardinals employed Jeff Luhnow (who went on to be the architect of the Houston Astros dynasty). But the General Manager of the team was John Mozeliak, a man without the now customary background in analytics. In 2015, the Cardinals were basically accused of corporate espionage (hacking into Jeff Luhnow’s Astro Database). Since that scandal, the Cardinals, under Mozeliak, have seemed to completely distrust the analytic side of Baseball. The team has double-downed on “Old School Baseball” philosophies such as trusting veterans and experience and mistrusting youth. During 2023, the Cardinals’ mismanagement of their best prospect, Jordan Walker, was epic. Their 2023/2024 off season moves so far, signing three mid-thirty starting pitchers to solve their rotation problems, go against the grain of modern Baseball thought. Of course, this doesn’t mean that it won’t work. Perhaps the Cardinals aging core has one last great race in them. But no one should bet on it. Success Cycle Position: On the downhill side, fighting the pull of the inevitable tide.

Unpublished Essay: What are the consequences of undervaluing the talent in your farm system (or are the modern St. Louis Cardinals following this ancient road to the basement or do they have enough talent in their farm system that they can survive this level of stupidity)?

25t. Washington Nationals

2021 Record: 65-97; 2022 Record: 55-107; 2023 Record: 71-91 [First Half: 33-48; Second Half 38-43].

Comment: The Nationals had one hell of a run from 2012 until 2019. Despite losing four times in the National League Division Series [2012, 2014, 2016 and 2017], the Gnats finished off their success cycle in style by capturing the 2019 World Championship. But then the Nationals crashed back to Earth. They are currently well into their rebuild. Now it is just a question of getting lucky with the talent (having your prospects develop, making some very wise free agent signings, and not doing anything wasteful or stupid). But this team will never again get as lucky as it did when it kicked off their 2012-2019 run by receiving two straight Number One Draft picks [in 2009: Steven Strasburg; in 2010 Bryce Harper]. They are going to have to get along with the 2022 #5 [Elijah Green, not looking too good yet]; 2023 #2 [Dylan Crews, looking pretty good so far], and the 2024 #10. The Players Union’s restructuring the Draft, beginning with the 2022, has definitely hurt the Nationals. Under the old system, Washington would have selected #1 in 2023 and #5 in 2024. However, if outfielder Dylan Crews and pitcher Mackenzie Gore both reach their potential, Washington will have effectively replaced Harper and Strasburg. Of course, that’s a very big if. Success Cycle Position: Once again on the way up.

Unpublished Essay: What do you do when all paths lead to perdition? The Washington Senators would have almost surely crashed and burned even if they had kept their core after their 2019 World Championship.

27. Chicago White Sox

2021 Record: 93-69; 2022 Record: 81-81; 2023 Record: 61-101 [First Half 34-47; Second Half 27-54].

Comment: The 2023 Chicago White Sox had perhaps the most complete reset year in Baseball. The season was such a disaster that they fired a seemingly entrenched front office. They fired the field manager. And they threw most of their veteran players into the abyss (trades, releases, and free agency). But there was one constant. The Owner Jerry Reinsdorf survived the purge. One gets the impression that Reinsdorf is one of the last dinosaur owners. He sits in his office and remembers the old days when the owners tried to break the Players’ Union. He doesn’t believe in all this ‘Moneyball’ analytical stuff. And he truly believes in a old style patronage system (i.e. he will be endlessly loyal to his employees as long as they kiss his ass). But in 2023 all this went out the window and Reinsdorf burned down the house for a rebuild. It seems pretty odd now that, just a few years ago, the White Sox seemed to be cresting up to the apex of a success cycle and would possibly rule the American League Central for at least four or five years. By all rights, the White Sox should rule the Central simply by being the division’s financial powerhouse. Instead, the team complied losing records from 2013 to 2019 before their brief fling with contention in 2021 & 2022. Maybe a total rebuild was in order. But Reinsdorf is still there. Success Cycle Position: Trapped in the Back Row, stuck in neutral after entering a Gran Prix.

Unpublished Essay: Were the Chicago Black Sox (the 1919 World Series team that threw the World Series) actually underpaid (or an essay wondering if the ghost of Charlie Comiskey still haunts the White Sox franchise).

28. Colorado Rockies

2021 Record: 74-87; 2022 Record: 68-94; 2023 Record: 59-103 [First Half: 31-50; Second Half: 28-53].

Comment: At this moment, the Colorado Rockies seem to be the most poorly run Baseball team in the Major Leagues. The team’s owner, the appropriately named Dick Monfort, seems completely clueless, his general managers (first Jeff Bridich 2015-2021 and then Bill Schmidt 2022-2023) seem pretty hapless, the players are basically useless (represented best by the ridiculously overpaid Kris Bryant), and the farm system is almost totally hopeless (rated as the worst or close to the worst farm system by most media outlets). It is probably even money that the Colorado Rockies will finish 2024 with the worst record in the Majors. In the second half of 2023 season, the Rockies finished with a worse record than either the Royals or Athletics (see below). But the Chicago White Sox, in total freefall, did manage to be even worse, finishing a horrid 27-54 to the Rockies 28-53. Maybe the only ray of sunshine for the Rockies is the fact that they hold the #3 draft pick in the 2024 Annual Amateur Baseball Player Underpayment Sweepstakes. Success Cycle Position: Lying on the Floor in a coma watching ancient “I’ve fallen and I can’t get up” commercials.

Unpublished Essay: If you could pick between 1) being happy despite being totally incompetent or 2) being miserable while being totally incompetent, which would you choose? The Colorado Rockies would be a lot more fun if they just embraced their inner self (i.e. hit home runs like crazy).

29. Kansas City Royals

2021 Record: 74-88; 2022 Record: 65-97; 2023 Record: 56-106 [First Half: 23-58; Second Half: 33-48].

Comment: The Kansas City Royals rebounded with a much better record in the second half of the 2023 season. There is some hope. In Bobby Witt, Jr., the team has a star player who may become a superstar. The KC Royals have some other young players who could mature into stars. They also seem to have, completely out of the blue, developed an ace pitcher in Cole Ragans [if his ligaments hold together]. However, KC has, other than Ragans, almost no decent pitching at all. If they can just come up with a few pitchers who can give them some decent bulk innings, the Royals may improve quite a bit in 2024. Interestingly, the KC Royals have been trying the opposite strategy of the Boston Red Sox. They have been using their top draft picks on pitchers (while the BoSox have been going after hitters). So far, it’s been a disaster for Kansas City. At this point, the Royals have just started down the yellow brick road back to contention. But there are promising signs. It will be interesting to see if the 2023 Royals’ disaster ends Zack Greinke’s career [after a brutal 2-15 season as a starter for shipwrecked KC]. It seems like a team could benefit from using Greinke as a reliever/pitching coach. Success Cycle Position: Lying on the Bottom but starting to crawl back to contention.

Unpublished Essay: Should a Baseball team attempt to establish a consistent identity over time (or should the Royals embrace their past to move into the future (an enlightened owner, the speed of artificial grass, and perhaps even the legacy of the Kansas City Monarchs)? [Companion essay to the Pittsburgh Pirates.]

30. Oakland Athletics

2021 Record: 86-76; 2022 Record: 60-102; 2023 Record: 50-112 [First half: 21-60; Second Half: 29-52].

Comment: The fix is in. For some reason, Major League Baseball really wants the Oakland franchise to move to Las Vegas. They want it so much that MLB has waived the normal relocation fee [around 300 million dollars or slightly more than 10 million for each of the other 29 teams]. Apparently the League envisions that the synergy between Baseball and Gambling will produce much more than this amount for each and every team. Somewhere in heaven [or possibly hell], Kennesaw Mountain Landis is spinning in his grave. On a team level, the Athletics are pulling off a good old fashioned tank [playing badly to collect high draft picks]. When they finally get to Vegas, the team may even be good again. Interestingly, the Players Union’s modifications of the Draft system to prevent teams being rewarded for tanking have, for now, probably hurt the Athletics the most. Despite having the worst record in 2023, they will pick 4th rather than 1st in 2024 (after dropping to 6th in 2023 after finishing in a three way tie for the 2nd worst record in 2022). Since Tanking was one of the many Moneyball strategies widely adopted and Moneyball was focused on Oakland, it almost feels appropriate. Success Cycle Position: On the bottom, trying to rebuild (or is there any Billy Beane magic left).

Unpublished Essay: Will the Oakland Athletics change their name to the Las Vegas Orphans? Many teams have relocated, but usually just once. Only the Athletics have relocated again, and again, and now yet again [this will be their third relocation]. Somewhere, the ghost of Connie Mack is moaning.

Post #33

My Baseball Blog Reconsidered

November 27, 2023

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. Winston Churchill

It has been four months since I last posted on my blog.* The 2023 Baseball season has come and gone with the Texas Rangers winning the World Series over the Arizona Diamondbacks. My last post was way back in July 2023 and was basically a mid-season wrap-up. After that post, my normal life, among other things, got in the way of any more posting. The “other things” basically break down into the following 4 categories:

*Actually 4 months and 19 days but who is counting other than me?

1. Lack of Brevity

I can’t seem to write a short post or resist biting off more than I can either chew or swallow. To practice writing short posts, I came up with the idea of writing a short article about each Major League team. This ending up with me writing 30 long essays simultaneously. Not one of my brighter ideas. Instead of writing a bunch of short snappy posts, I got endlessly bogged down in 30 separate essays and couldn’t really complete anything. I did publish 4 posts of these “2023 Franchise Reviews” at a rate that would have finished the last post sometime in 2025 or so. The solution to this lack of brevity seems pretty obvious: no more planning a whole bunch of posts, just post about whatever random baseball stuff is currently interesting me.

2. Joe Posnanski

Of course, the problem with that is Joe Posnanski. I love Joe Posnanski. If I could write about Baseball as well as Joe Posnanski, I would be a happy man. I subscribe to his blog. I even bought his book (Baseball 100) and had him inscribe it for me (though I now completely regret that, and I should have just picked it up cheaply from Amazon or some other crummy bookseller). But I also hate Joe Posnanski (of course, hate is probably too strong a word. I feel that I would like him if we actually met).* Over the past year, there have been many times that I was inspired to write a short Baseball post. But then I open my Joe Posnanski email blog link to find: that Mr. Posnanski has just written a post about the same subject that is clearer, better written, and much funnier than anything I was going to produce. Maybe hate is not too strong a word. Once again, the solution is obvious. Just throw up posts about whatever I am currently digesting (about Baseball, I mean).

*Bill James and Joe Posnanski would probably be tied as my two favorite Baseball writers. But I have always felt that, if I actually met Bill James, the chances that I would like him are slim. But life is funny. Perhaps we would get along famously if stuck in an elevator together (or some other unlikely scenario) while I would not be able to stand Joe in the same situation. Who really knows?

3. Rabbit Holes

Yet another problem I have with writing posts for my Baseball Blog would just be “Rabbit Holes.” Recently I was working on the “2023 Franchise Review” for the Oakland Athletics. The A’s will be moving from their Oakland home to Las Vegas sometime in the near future. In the history of Baseball, there have been many other franchise shifts like this. However, the A’s are the ‘skipping stone’ of Baseball teams. This will be their third move. But I had a hard time really focusing on this A’s post. I went down one rabbit hole about recent Baseball retirements. I read a biography of the great Sam Crawford who played for the Detroit Tigers way back in the days of Ty Cobb (going down down multiple rabbit holes in the process). And those would just be the main Baseball rabbit holes while also trying to write about the A’s. Every time I get a SABR Bulletin in my inbox, there is, at the very least, some small rabbit hole awaiting. The solution to my third problem is pretty much exactly the same as the first two. I should just quickly write up my rabbit hole reveries.

4. Who Cares?

And finally there is one final and completely separate problem (from the first three). As far as I know, no one is reading any of this. My motivation to write a post for my Blog often takes second or third or fifty-first precedence to such things as: spending time with my children or simply goofing off. It’s hell to be retired and also quite sweet all at the same time. But I promise myself, if to absolutely no one else, to do better.

Now that I’ve finished with this exercise in one hand clapping, I’ll actually try to start my next actual Baseball Blog post. It will be a wrap-up of my previous 2023 Franchise Review series and my very last actual post: “2023 Mid-Season Review” way back on July 8th, 2023 [#32]. Hopefully, this post will come out both quickly and be published before the year ends. After that, I will just post about whatever random Baseball stuff catches my fancy.

JHR

Post #32

2023 Mid-Season Review

July 8, 2023

If you find yourself stuck in the middle, there is only one way to go: forward. Richard Branson

This post will be a random collection of thoughts on each Major League team with the 2023 season at its halfway point. One of the beauties of Baseball is the ebb and flow of the game. Batters catch fire and cool off. Pitchers find a groove and pitch lights out… then lose it and get rocked. Teams leap forward and recede. Often there is a rhyme and reason for all this. Batters catch fire because they face pitchers that they hammer and cool off because they face pitchers that have their number. Teams go on winning streaks after playing weak opponents and then recede when the competition is stiffer.* Pitchers? Who the hell knows what is going on with pitchers. There is a beauty to this ebb and flow of the game that deepens your appreciation for it over time.

*McGraw’s 1916 New York Giants hold the Major League record for consecutive victories at 26. If recollection serves, all 26 games were played at home in the Polo Grounds of New York against teams from the bottom half of the standings.

1a. Atlanta Braves [54-27 after 81 games, exactly halfway through the season]: On pace to win 108 games in 2023 and with a set line-up for the foreseeable future, the Braves, already a good team, have changed into a juggernaut. They may win 100+ games for the next five (or more) years if the young core stays relatively uninjured and the pitching hold ups. The Atlanta Braves of the 2020s may make the great Braves of the 1990s teams look like total underachievers. They already have one World Series Championship under belt (2021). Already probably the best hitting team in the Major Leagues, the Atlanta Braves seem to be mutating into the most ferocious offensive team since the Cincinnati Big Red Machine of the 1970s. If their young players continue to develop along a normal growth path, they may be even better than that legendary team. There is no Atlanta Brave equivalent to the light hitting Cesar Geronimo of the 1975 and 1976 World Champion Reds. All these guys can all hit.

1b. Tampa Bay Rays [54-27]: Also on pace to win 108 games, the TB Rays are a different animal than the Braves. Other than Wander Franco, their best player, they have not locked up their core players. But the analytical processes that keep Tampa Bay fielding good teams year after year are still in place. The only difference this year is that the Rays are having good luck. Their core players are performing well and team is, for the most part, injury free. If you field a team that should win 90 games, year after year, the team will in some years win 100 games through good luck and in other years win just 80 games or so because of bad luck, injuries, and sub-par performance. You have to wonder how long Tampa Bay can keep doing this. Almost all the other Major League teams want to be like the Rays and the talent drain out of that front office has been ferocious. Of course, what most of these other “copycat” teams admire the most about Tampa is that they field a good team on the cheap. The smart part is much harder to duplicate.

3. Texas Rangers [49-32]: Doubling down, in life or in poker, usually doesn’t work. It goes against the theory of sunk costs (i.e. tossing more good money into bad investments while refusing to cut your losses). After finishing with a brutal 60 and 102 record in 2021, the Rangers thought that they were close to contending in 2022. Despite signing top free agents 2B Marcus Semien and SS Corey Seager to help put them over the top, they only improved to 68-94. Throwing caution to the winds, the Rangers then signed top free agent Jacob deGrom and three time World Champion manager Bruce Bochy to lead them in 2023. The decision to redouble their efforts has completely paid off for the Rangers (despite the fact that their decision to outbid everyone for deGrom is not looking good at all). It’s easy to root for a team that (after being severely beaten) picks itself up, dusts themselves off, and tries twice as hard.

4a. Arizona Diamondbacks [48-33]: For the 2023 season, the Major Leagues adopted a slew of rules to speed up the game. It was surmised that these rule changes would benefit the young and gifted and be to the detriment of the old and slow. With less time to think, quick reaction times are emphasized. The Arizona Diamondbacks would be shining example of this hypothesis. If they keep this pace up (so to speak), they will go from 74-88 to 96-66 (and into the play-offs). Much of this upsurge is due to the first full year of play by Corbin Carroll, already the team’s best player. If you squint your eyes, you can imagine Carroll (who is listed as being just 5 feet and 10 inches tall and only 165 pounds heavy, as one of the many great players from the olden days of baseball who were about his size. The average modern baseball player is just a littler bit smaller than the legendary Babe Ruth (who was considered a giant man during his time and nicknamed Big Fella among other things). With Jose Altuve, Carroll is living proof that the sheer size of modern players does not automatically make them better than those who played long ago.

4b. Baltimore Orioles [48-33]: The Orioles and the Nationals share a Regional Sports Network [RSN]. The Orioles are the majority partner in this RSN. This set-up is hardly by choice on the Nationals part. When the sad sack Montreal Expos moved to Washington in 2005, Peter Angelos, the Orioles’ owner and a famous lawyer, threatened litigation if he was not recompensated for the Nats invading his “territory.” Bud Selig, then the commissioner of Baseball, caved and gave away the Nationals TV rights to the Orioles RSN. He could do this because, at that time, the Expos were under control of Major League Baseball, not any individual owner. Faced with a delicate situation that needed serious negotiation, Selig simply gave away the whole farm. Incredibly, he gave away the Nationals RSN TV rights… in perpetuity! Why didn’t Selig just give them for 10, 20, 30, or 50 years (or Angelos’ lifetime). Why did he give them away forever, thus creating an endless problem. In any event, there is a on-going lawsuit by the Nationals against the Orioles. Recently, it was decided that the Nationals had short-changed (cheated) the Nationals out of 100 million for the years 2012-2016. Two more lawsuits (for 2017-2021 and 2022-2026) are underway. Bud Selig is rightly remembered for the greedy owner lockout of the players that canceled the 1994 World Series. But it is hardly the only black eye on his record. It is nice to see the Orioles have a good team again; but it is hard as hell to root for any team owned by the Angelos family.

6. Miami Marlins [47-34]: The Marlins have always seemed to be an incognito team, lacking any real identity. The team has been owned by a succession of pretty scummy owners. The early history of the team is almost bizzare. From the formation of the team in 1993 until 2003, the Miami Marlins had only two winning seasons, 1997 & 2003. In both years, the team won the World Series. From 2004 to 2009, the club treaded water, not really bad but not really good either. From 2010 to 2022, the Marlins had losing seasons every year except the covid aborted 2020 season (in which the team went 31 and 29 and surely would have finished with a losing record if the season had been completed). Perhaps, this year marks a resurgence to relativity for the club. In my opinion, they shouldn’t be taken seriously until they change their name to something better. How about Miami Knights (which could translated into Spanish as the Miami Caballeros)? All this being said, the Marlins will probably win their 3rd undeserved World Championship this year just out of spite.

7. Los Angeles Dodgers [46-35]: The Dodgers are right in line for a 90-95 win season despite an avalanche of injuries to their pitching staff. Considering the fact that they are rebooting their team (not going all out to win and giving a lot of rookies a chance to contribute), the Dodgers still appear to be headed for the playoffs. Given a year to break in their rookies, the Dodgers should be set for 2024. If they sign Shohei Ohtani as a free agent after this season, the Los Angeles Dodgers may well become the West Coast version of the Braves’ East Coast super-team. Obviously, the LA Dodgers have to be considered the front-runner for the services of Ohtani. And the team certainly seems to have positioned themselves to go after Ohtani. A recent poll revealed that most of the players in the Majors believe that Ohtani will end up with the LA Dodgers. So why does it feel like that the odds of Ohtani ending up with the Dodgers seem like slim and none?

8a. New York Yankees [45-36]: The Yankees are a collection of old and injury prone players. Lately, every Yankee season seems to turn into some sort of death march with the team trying to massage their creaky players over the finish line. The talent is there to claim a championship but the good health, and will power from the executive suite, is not. The patience shown Anthony Volpe, the team’s struggling rookie shortstop has been a little eye-opening. The Yankees have kept on playing Volpe through his slumps and calls for his demotion by all the media’s shouting heads. Volpe, given this long leash, seems to have finally turned the corner. The last time that the Yankees were patient with their rookies, the team was ultimately rewarded with their 1996 to 2000 dynasty. Of course, the one major difference this time is that Hal Steinbrenner is not George. Unlike his father, it is hard to picture Hal going balls to the walls to win a Championship.

8b. San Francisco Giants [45-36]: The Giants have been trying to play chess while the rest of the National League is playing checkers ever since Farhan Zaidi became the team’s general manager. In 2021, the Giants went 107-55 when all their moves came up aces. In 2022, the team ended up playing tic tac toe instead of chess and wound up 81-81. This year, it seems like Zaidi’s strategies are working once again, though not as well as in 2021 (which was a unique season). So what is San Francisco doing? Basically, the team seems to be trying each year to deepen and then absolutely maximize its Major League talent. All teams do this to some extent. But the Giants are all in. The Giants use analytics to try to always get the best pitcher/batter and batter/pitcher match-ups possible. They platoon. They try to have deep depth so they can rest their players. Their new age manager, Gabe Kapler, is a bodybuilder and mental guru. The Giants have the largest coaching staff in the game to ensure that the players have access to any help necessary. The team is built in a very liberal and progressive, one could even say granola way. In other words, the Giants perfectly represent the city of San Francisco itself.

10a. Houston Astros [44-37]: The bloom is off the rose for Houston. In 2022, their deep and excellent pitching staff led the Astros to victory in the World Series. Like many pitching staffs throughout baseball history, the Astros are now paying the price. Pitching, more than any other baseball act, wears and tears at its practitioners bodies. Pitching staffs that excel one season tend to fall apart, either slightly or completely, the next. The Astros waxed their way all the way to a 2022 World Championship. The Astro pitchers are now waning because of minor aches and major injuries. Of course, the disastrous signing of Jose Abreu to bolster the offense has not helped. This signing signaled a disturbing trend in team philosophy. They were investing in assets that were already fading. It seemed like a something that was going to be a problem somewhere down the line for Houston as Abreu got deeper into his 30s. No one (as far as I know) predicted Abreu’s immediate and complete face plant. It will be interesting to see if he will rebound at all in the second half of the 2023 season. The Houston Astros are old and the now Grim Reaper is at the door much earlier than expected.

10b. Los Angeles Angels [44-37]: Mike Trout is now clearly on the down slope of his career. Basically, he was the best player in Baseball from 2012 (his first full season) until 2019. His peak had two stages: 1) 2012 to 2016 and 2) 2017 to 2019. In the first stage, Trout was very much an everyday player (appearing in 157 to 159 games every year from 2013 to 2016). In 2017, he morphed into an even better player and would have hit well over 40 HRs (or even 50) every year if he could have just stayed healthy. His control of the strike zone peaked and he actually walked more than he struck out in 2017 and 2018. But during his 2017 to 2019 stage, he simply could not stay on the field for a full season, playing 114, 140, and then 134 games. Since his peak years ended in 2019, he has slowly and then suddenly lost control of the strike zone while being even more injury prone [just 36 games in 2021]. In 2022, he walked 56 times while striking out 139 times in just 119 games. In 2023, he has 45 BBs and 103 SOs in 81 games. With Mike Trout clearly in accelerated decline, the Angels will be even more brutal in 2024 if they do not resign Shohei Ohtani.

*Note: this was written on July 3, right before Trout broke the hamate bone in his left hand, pretty much wrecking the rest of 2023 for him.

10c. Toronto Blue Jays [44-37]: The Blue Jays may be the poster child for the nepotistic flavor of modern baseball. Many MLB teams feature the children of former Major Leaguers (or even grandchildren). But the Jays have the sons of two Hall of Famers (Craig Biggio and Vlad Guerrero) and the son of a player who once year lead the National League with 40 HRs, 128 RBIs, and a .620 SA (Dante Bichette Sr). Strangely enough, the son of the non Hall-of-Famer (Bo Bichette) probably will end up the best of the three. Cavan Biggio will end up the worst; and Vlad Guerrero Jr. seems likely to end up the second coming of Prince Fielder (also a son of a former Major League home run and RBI king, Cecil Fielder). Prince, of course, peaked at 23 (50 HRs) and 25 (141 RBIs). He was out of baseball at the age of 32.

13a. Cincinnati Reds [43-38]: Elly De La Cruz was listed near the top of most pre-season prospect lists. These prospect lists cited his lack of selectivity at the plate as his only drawback while noting that he probably had the highest potential ceiling of any prospect. Other than selectivity, these prospect lists talked about: 1) his absurdly quick bat; 2) his ridiculously strong throwing arm, 3) his otherworldly running speed; and 4) his light tower power. Now he is in the Major Leagues and it is hard to keep your eyes off him. He is all that was claimed and more. The fact that all these gifts are wrapped up in a 6 foot 5 inch/200 pound frame make it even better. Not since McGwire and Bonds in the 1990s has Baseball had two players who I would literally stop everything just to watch their at bats. But Ohtani and Cruz are even better than McGwire and Bonds (in a way) because their ridiculous gifts are much greater than just hitting home runs. If Cruz ever bulks up and keeps this bat speed (and gets much more selective), he could be Barry Bonds 2.0; but playing infield with an outrageous throwing arm. The possibilities are currently endless.

13b. Milwaukee Brewers [43-38]: It is nice to see that Christian Yelich has had a bit of a dead cat bounce. From 2013 to 2017, he was a very good outfielder. In 2018 and 2019, he suddenly changed into a MVP candidate, hitting 36 and then 44 HRs respectively. Of course, the year 2019 was the peak of the rabbit ball and, after 2019, the ball was deadened. But the rabbit ball simply cannot explain Yelich’s power explosion in 2018 & 2019 or batting collapse from 2020 to 2022 (14 HRs in 154 games for 2022). Yelich was bothered by many injuries during his collapse and apparently these bruises changed his swing. In 2023, Yelich has returned to his pre-MVP candidate good outfielder form. In fact, Yelich has been steadily improving as the 2023 season has progressed. If this continues, Christian Yelich will have his best season since his 2018-2019 peak. Cody Bellinger of the Cubs, whose career has oddly mirrored Yelich’s ups and downs, is also having a badly injured feline rebound too.

13c. Philadelphia Phillies [43-38]: The Phillies are one of the most entertaining Major League teams. General manager Dave Dombrowski collected a bunch of defensively challenged sluggers, best represented by Kyle Schwarber, to try to win a Championship. The team got all the way to the World Series before losing to the buzzsaw that was the 2023 Houston Astro’s pitching staff. This anti-modern analytics (i.e. Moneyball) strategy is quite interesting. Moneyball is all about quantifying values for every physical action on the baseball field, both offensively and defensively, and then finding those areas that are under-valued. Did Dombrowski find a Moneyball edge in Moneyball itself? In other words, did he figure out that Moneyball was quantifying some baseball values incorrectly and exploit them? Did he Moneyball the strategy of Moneyball? It certainly seems like he did.

16a. Boston Red Sox [40-41]: There are usually two different types of Baseball teams: Contenders and Pretenders. The contenders were teams actively trying to win the pennant… while the pretenders were not. The current Red Sox club seems to be a new hybrid: a pretending contender or contending pretender. Under this strategy, the team gathers together enough talented players that, if they all have good or great years, the club will suddenly become a surprise contender. If the talent base has injuries or off years, the team will wallow as a pretender. This strategy may have had its origin in the Red Sox’s 2013 and 2018 seasons. In 2013, the Red Sox, coming off a 69-93 record in 2012, put together a random collection of talent. These players all had good years and rampaged all the way through the season (97-65) to a very improbable World Series Championship. In 2014, the very same players collapsed, finishing 71-91. In 2018, a very good team (93-69 in 2017), coalesced and incredibly went 108-54 before winning another World Series. In 2019, they busted, ending up at 84-68. With the two World Series under their belt because of this boom or bust strategy, the Red Sox seem to have completely adopted it. Unfortunately it’s already apparent that 2023 will be another contending pretender year.

16b. Minnesota Twins [40-41]: There is an old joke that goes: What walks on four legs in its youth, two legs in its prime, and three legs in its old age. The answer, of course, is man (crawls as a baby, then walks normally, uses a cane in old age). But what if the baby never becomes a man? What if there is no prime and the baby goes straight to old age? There is a child development term to describe this lack of evolution: Failure to Thrive. For some reason, the Twins have a bunch of players who have failed to thrive (Byron Buxton, Miguel Sano, and Max Kepler in particular). Kepler would seem to be the poster child for this problem. All his analytics are good…. except that he continuously hits the ball hard on the ground. Launch angle? We don’t need no stinking launch angle. It’s been years now and no one has addressed it. I sincerely hope Max goes to the Dodgers or some other savvy organization before its too late.

18a. Cleveland Guardians [39-42]: It is interesting how some teams are able to keep a consistent identity over time. For instance, the NY Yankees have pretty much maintained their “Bronx Bombers” identity ever since they bought Babe Ruth from Boston. The Cleveland Indians, for the longest time (1901 to 1959), fielded consistently good, sometimes great, teams. In those 59 years, the club had 42 winning seasons and only 17 losing years [no .500 years]. From 1960 to 1993, the Indians were consistently mediocre. They were often terrible and sometimes good, but never contenders. Their constant also-ran status led to the Indian’s reputation as a perennial loser being memorialized in the movie Major League. In the 1990s, the Indians reemerged as a powerhouse with an amazing collection of sluggers (Albert Belle, Manny Ramirez, Juan Gonzalez, Jim Thome). Now, in a Jeckyll and Hyde twist, the Indians have been renamed the Guardians and are channeling the Deadball era of Baseball. It is amazing that any modern team could have a team with two regular outfielders that will not hit 10 home runs, or anywhere close to 10 home runs, in a season.

18b. Seattle Mariners [39-42]: The Seattle Mariners have had two all-time top 100 players start their careers with the club. First there was Ken Griffey. But Griffey only played half his career with the Mariners. He eventually forced his trade to his hometown team, the Cincinnati Reds. As soon as he joined the Reds, Griffey’s career went in a tailspin. Injuries and a lack of desire to stay in shape led to ineffectiveness. The Mariners dodged a bullet by letting Griffey go. The second all-time top 100 player was Alex Rodriguez. But Rodriguez did not even play half his career in Seattle. Once again, the Mariners dodged a bullet. Rodriguez did not turn into a pumpkin like Griffey. Through the use of steroids, Rodriguez was a great player for a long time after leaving Seattle. But the steroids led him down a dark and ugly path. Now the Mariners have another potential great player: Julio Rodriguez (though he probably not be an all-time top 100 player unless he improves quickly and then suddenly). Here’s to hoping that the second half of his career doesn’t die like Griffey’s long fade or twist in the wind like A-Rod’s syringe fueled nightmare.

18c. Pittsburgh Pirates [39-42]: In the 1970s, the Pirates had an identity that no team could probably get away with now. They were the blackest team in the Majors (i.e. African and Latin black players, not the color of their uniforms or something). Famously, they fielded the first all Black line-up in 1971. This was very much in contrast with the other Pennsylvania team (the Philadelphia Phillies) which had a blue-collar redneck (i.e. white) reputation. This identity peaked and culminated in the Willie Stargell led “We are Family” 1979 World Championship Pirates team. In 2022, the Tampa Bay Rays had the very first All-Latin player line-up on September 15 (which was Roberto Clemente day). Which all-something line-up will be next? All-White (by racist default), All Black, and All Latin have all now been done. When will the first All-Asian line-up happen? Perhaps when the Tokyo Giants join the Majors in 2055? But, more seriously, the Pirates have the #1 pick in the 2023 Major League draft. Can the team finally turn around its long recent history of simply being an incubator for other team’s stars and get an identity of it’s own again?

21. Chicago Cubs [38-43]: One year ago, the Chicago signed Seiya Suzuki out of Japan. Playing regularly in the Cubbies outfield, Suzuki has now struggled through one and a half years in the Major Leagues. This year, the Boston Red Sox signed Japanese outfielder Masataka Yoshida out of Japan. From 2019 to 2021, Suzuki hit for OPS marks of 1.018, .953, and 1.073 in Japan respectively. On the other hand, from 2020 to 2022, Yoshida had consecutive OPS marks of .966, .992, and 1.008 in Japan.* Comparatively, Yoshida hit for a slightly better BA (batting average) with greater plate discipline in Japan. But Seiya Suzuki had much greater power. So far, Yoshida has been a much better hitter in the Majors than Suzuki. Why is this so? Suzuki has had some injuries. But so has Yoshida. It may simply be mental. Yoshida seems to truly love playing in the Majors. He met his idol (Bryce Harper). It has been reported that Yoshida has planned to come over for years. Suzuki? It seems like his primary reason may have simply been the pay. For many years, Japanese pitchers have had more success than Japanese hitters in the Majors (except Ichiro & Hideki Matsui). Pitchers, by and large, are a confidant group. It may be that the largest part of coming to America for Japanese players is psychological rather than talent related.

*OPS combines two very disparate statistics: OBP (On Base Percentage) and SA (Slugging Percentage), but is a handy way of representing offensive production.

22. San Diego Padres [37-44]: In baseball, all things usually even out. At the end of the year, the great hitters and pitchers have compiled their stats. The players hitting .400 for half a year have been brought back to earth. Unless injuries have crippled them, player performance remains steady, advancing and receding with age. In other words, the Padres have too much talent to continue to wallow in the second division like they are now. But nothing is a given. Up until now, the Padre’s 2023 season has been beset by injuries and under-performance. There is no guarantee that it will turn around. But, in all likelihood, it will. If someone wants to bet you that the Pads will not improve upon their 37-44 first half record, you should probably take that bet.

23. New York Mets [36-45]: Yet another example of the fickleness of the Gods of Baseball. Almost everything went right for the Mets in 2022. Starting with the injury that sidelined their star closer (Edwin Diaz), most things have gone wrong for the Mets in 2023. Of course, pitching is a much more fickle talent than batting. After the 2022 season, the NY Mets had some pitching choices to make. They kept one of their aces, Max Scherzer. The Mets let their other ace, Jacob deGrom, go. They keep only Carlos Carrasco from their back end starting depth, letting Chris Bassitt & Taijuan Walker go. They kept their sixth and seventh starters, David Peterson & Tyler McGill, hoping both could step up. The Mets signed future Hall of Famer Jason Verlander to replace DeGrom and signed Japanese star Kodai Senga for backend depth. Realistically, they did not really make any mistakes. Perhaps the Mets could have tried harder to sign Bassitt and Walker to maintain their remarkable starting depth. But letting DeGrom go turned out to be a blessing as his rotator cuff soon blew out again. Like the Padres above, the tide has been against them. Will the tide turn for the Mets before the season ends? There is an awful lot of talent on this team. It’s more likely than unlikely.

24. Detroit Tigers [35-46]: It’s amazing that the Tigers continue to let Miguel Cabrera soak up at bats simply because they have to overpay him. Cabrera hasn’t been worth his salary since 2017. From 2017 to 2021, the argument could have been made that there was a (slim) chance that Cabrera had one last blast-from-the-past left in him. After all, Albert Pujols, after being just a pale shadow of his one-time greatness from 2017 to 2021, found the fountain of youth in 2022 and went out with an astonishing finishing kick. But Albert Pujols showed up for Spring Training in 2022 in the best shape that anyone had seen him in for years. Miguel Cabrera, who has been showing up with a double chin for many years, showed up for 2023 with a triple chin. The Tigers cannot be taken seriously until this man no longer plays for them (or they at least nail him to the bench and maybe pinch hit him every blue moon just for the fun of it).

25a. Chicago White Sox [34-47]: The hiring of the elderly Tony LaRussa to be the White Sox manager in 2021 seems to have completely derailed the White Sox organization. To be fair, LaRussa did lead the Pale Sox into the 2021 post season (where they were quickly eliminated). But 2022 was a disaster and the Sox, who looked like they could become a perennial contender, probably now should be torn down and rebuilt. However, it is good to see Luis Robert, the latest in a long line of Cuban sluggers, finally fulfill his 40 to 50 HR per season promise. This team seems to be living proof on how fast the sun can set on a contender.

25b. St. Louis Cardinals [34-47]: There seems to something gone wrong with the Cardinals organization. From 2000 to 2015 or so, there were indications that the Redbirds were a blend of the best of both the vintage traditional way of running a baseball team and the modern analytical approach of Moneyball. From 2003 to 2011, the Cards employed Jeff Luhnow as their nerd stats guy. He then left to run the Astros. In 2015, the Cardinals were investigated by the FBI for hacking into the databases of the Luhnow’s Astros. An analyst for the Cardinals, Chris Correa, went to jail. In 2017, Major League Baseball fined the team two million dollars and took away 2 draft picks for what happened. The reaction of the Cardinals to all this may have been to lean back into tradition and jettison the analytics. The current GM of the club, John Mozeliak comes from a traditional scouting background. The current field manager, Oliver Marmol, has gotten quite a bit of bad press for acting like an embarrass-the-player old-school manager. And the Cardinals have hemorrhaged talent in a series of horrible talent decisions (trades or releases of Randy Arozarena, Zac Gallen, Sandy Alcantara, Adolis Garcia, etc). It may be time for the consultants to come in and clean house.

27. Washington Nationals [33-48]: Since the Washington Nationals won the 2019 World Baseball Championship on the once strong right arm of Stephen Strasburg, their fate has pretty much paralleled the ruin of that appendage. Possibly the most interesting thing about this season for the Nationals will be the Major League Draft. In a way, the 2023 Major League Draft will be a very interesting echo of history. In 2009 & 2010, Washington had consecutive #1 draft picks. With these picks, the team choose Stephen Strasburg and Bryce Harper respectively. Rule changes have made it impossible for that to happen again [i.e. a team getting the #1 pick of the draft two years in a row]. But this year, Washington has the #2 draft pick in an incredibly loaded draft class in which the consensus #1 and #2 picks will be either a pitcher (Paul Skenes) or an outfielder (Dylan Crews). Which will the Nationals begin the rebuild with? This time the Nats have no choice. They will have to just take whoever is not picked by the Pirates (who hold the #1 pick).

28. Colorado Rockies [31-50]: The worst type of Baseball team to root for is one with a dreadful Major League team and a terrible farm system. It’s just a very hopeless feeling for a fan. The Rockies have one true former star on the roster, Kris Bryant, and he kind of symbolizes the whole team. At one time (2015 to 2017), Bryant looked like a future Hall of Famer. Now he is getting by on just the dregs of his talents and a bloated paycheck. The gloom that surrounds the Rockies even extends to the 2023 draft. In the deepest draft class in a long time, the Rockies don’t even get a top pick. They have the #9 choice, which is still good, but hardly what they need. They need a #1 or a #2.

29. Kansas City Royals [23-58]: Using the Pythagorean theorem to predict a team’s winning percentage, the KC Royals are nowhere near as bad a team as the doomed Oakland Athletics.* But their records are quite similar. Kansas City is a team in transition: out with the old, in with the new. Baseball is often like this, players coming and going like ships in the night. It will certainly be sad to see Zack Greinke, currently having what looks like his final season, go. By any standard, Greinke has been one of the most fascinating players of the last 20 years. Probably the most compelling reason to watch the Royals right now is the start of Bobby Witt, Junior’s career. For some reason (maybe the flowing hair), Witt brings to mind Robin Yount. Hopefully, for the Royals, Witt has a career as good as the former Milwaukee Brewer star and Hall of Famer.

*The formula is: (Runs scored squared) divided by (Runs scored squared +runs allowed squared).

30. Oakland Athletics [21-60]: On course to lose 120 games in 2023 (and tie the Major League record for losses in a single season), the Athletics have the worst record in the Major Leagues entirely on merit. But the team has also provided proof of the complete uniqueness of baseball. After beginning the season with a pitiful 12-50 record, Oakland won an amazing seven [7] straight games. In what other sport could a team this bad suddenly rip off 7 victories in a row? Since that streak, the Athletics have returned to form, immediately losing 8 games in row after their winning streak ended. Apparently this will be the Athletics last season in Oakland before they are relocated to Las Vegas. Here’s hoping they can go out of town taking down the New York Mets 1962 record of 120 losses.

Post #31

2023 Franchise Review [Number 4]: New York Mets (2022 Record: 101-61)

July 3, 2023

It’s when the Yankees score eight runs in the first inning and then slowly pull away. Jacob Ruppert, owner of the New York Yankees [1915 to 1939], when asked to describe his perfect day at the ballpark.

1. The Best Owner in Baseball?

For the most part, the owners of Major League Baseball teams are despicable people (there may be an exception or three). You don’t get to be a billionaire without cheating and stomping on other human beings. All that being said, the average Baseball fan probably could care less about the loathsomeness of their local owner than whether that owner wants the team to win too. So who (or what) would be the perfect Baseball team owner from a fan’s perspective? It probably would not be a corporation.* By definition, a corporation will (or at least should) always value profits over a championship. A corporate team will just try to win the World Series as a result of an established profit-making process. A championship would simply be a by-product of this system. But an efficient corporate team would never go all-in to win or overspend simply for a chance of victory. For this reason, the typical fan would probably much prefer an owner with an overwhelming desire to win. Of course, one of the major stories of 21st century Major League Baseball has been the adoption of the so-called Money Ball philosophy in whole or in part by virtually all Major League teams. And Money Ball, at its essence, is simply the very successful application of some modern corporate processes to Baseball. So perhaps the perfect Major League team owner would be one who applies the corporate processes of Money Ball to his team but also wants to win so much that he is willing to throw both processes and profits aside if necessary? This dream owner would be both stupid rich (able to overspend for the fun of it) & also hopefully from an industry that relies heavily on process, like perhaps some kind of investment manager.

*Interestingly, the two Major League teams currently owned by corporations, Atlanta (Liberty Media) and Toronto (Rogers Communications), are both very well run and quite successful.

2. The Tao of Steve Cohen

On October 30, 2020, billionaire hedge fund manager Steve Cohen purchased the New York Mets from the much maligned Fred Wilpon.* Mets fans rejoiced, assuming that any other owner would be better than the weirdly incompetent Fred Wilpon and family. Almost three years later, it has become apparent that the new Met’s ownership has cleared the bar of that assumption with room to spare. Cohen, who is reportedly the richest owner in the Majors, has spent his money on his new team as if the success of the team is much more important than actual profits. Of course, Cohen may be spending money now under the assumption that he will recoup it later (in economic terms, he is building up a reservoir of good will). In many ways, Steve Cohen seems to be following the diagram laid out by George Steinbrenner, the former owner of the New York Yankees (only without King George’s narcissism): spend money hand over fist for the best players and all the cash and publicity will ensure that good things happen. Also, since Cohen is a “billionaire hedge fund manager,” there seems to be an implicit assumption that he is competent and knows exactly what he is doing. Steve Cohen certainly says all the right things (such as often stating that he wants to model his New York Mets after the extremely competently run Los Angeles Dodgers). If one assumes that Cohen is a visionary and not just some guy throwing money around like it is nothing but paper, then the hiring of Billy Eppler on November 19, 2021, as the club’s General Manager has implications that cannot be denied. Billy Eppler does not fit with Cohen’s stated desire to be the Los Angeles Dodgers East.

*See Addendum #1

3. Steve Cohen Hires a General Manager

Born in 1975, Billy Eppler* has a interesting baseball resume: 1) a California native, he enrolled at San Diego Mesa College in 1993 and played baseball there; 2) he transferred to the University of Connecticut and played baseball for the UConn Huskies under an athletic scholarship; 3) Billy Eppler’s college career was ended by an arm injury; 4) he graduated in 1998 with a degree in finance; and, after interning for a year for the NFL’s Washington Redskins, he was hired in 2000 by the Colorado Rockies as a scout. In 2005, Eppler joined the New York Yankees as their director of scouting. in 2011, he was promoted to assistant general manager. Late in 2015, Eppler was hired away from the Yanks to be the general manager of the Los Angeles Angels, a position Eppler held from 2016 to 2020. On November 18th of 2021, Billy Eppler was hired by Steve Cohen to be the New York Mets’ general manager. Eppler was hardly Steve Cohen’s first pick for this job. And his hiring did not fit the presumed narrative. Instead of hiring one of the analytical data-driven general manager prospects that have flooded into Major League Baseball front offices recently, Cohen hired someone who would have fit right into the former jockocracy front offices that were swept away by the new Money Ball generation. If Steve Cohen’s plan was to follow the front office blueprints laid down by the Los Angeles Dodgers or Tampa Bay Rays, Bill Eppler was not the man for the job. So what were Billy Eppler’s main qualifications to be the general manager of the New York Mets?

4. The Man Who Signed the Japanese Babe Ruth

Like most Los Angeles general managers, Billy Eppler* started the job in 2016 with a five year plan to build the mediocre Angels into a powerhouse. He had the great advantage of inheriting a team with the best player in Baseball, Mike Trout, already on the roster. In 2016, the Angels finished with a 74-88 record despite Trout’s presence. In 2017 and 2018, the Angels finished with identical 80-82 records. Then, in 2019 and the covid-wrecked 2020 season, the Angels receded to 72-90 [.444] and 26-34 [.433] records. All this despite the addition of the Once and Future King as the best player in Baseball, Shohei Ohtani, to a roster that still included Trout. Any analysis of Billy Eppler’s tenure as the Los Angeles Angels general manager from 2016 to 2020 would have to conclude that it was an abject failure. So why did Steve Cohen hire him? Was there no one else like perhaps a very motivated ballpark crackerjack vendor? Basically, the answer is already included above. The one great success of Eppler’s stint as the Angels GM was somehow convincing Ohtani to sign on the dotted line. The most probable takeaway from Steve Cohen’s hiring of Billy Eppler is that Cohen will be going pedal to the metal after Shohei when Ohtani becomes a free agent after the 2023 season. So far, in Steve Cohen’s time as the Mets’ owner, the one constant has been a George Steinbrenner like willingness to overspend for true star players. The big story of the 2022 to 2023 off-season was the odd free agent journey of Carlos Correa. After originally signing with the Giants, Correa failed his physical and had his contract voided. Cohen then stepped in and signed Correa to another massive contract [315 million for12 years]. Reportedly, Cohen did this practically on a whim while vacationing in Hawaii. This is Steinbrenner-like impulsivity. Correa then also failed his Mets’ physical (when the Mets used the same doctor that San Francisco did). Eppler has been hired to give the Mets a leg up in the upcoming Ohtani free agency.

*Apparently Billy, not William, is his actual first name.

Searching for the Next Jacob Ruppert

So far, Steve Cohen’s tenure as the New York Mets’ owner has been mostly one of impulsivity, like a boy with a new toy. In 2021, his first year, the Mets were mediocre, finishing with a 77-85 record. In his second year, 2022, Cohen threw money at the problem and the Mets had a miracle type year, recording a fantastic 101-61 record before getting quickly bounced out of the playoffs. For 2023, Steve Cohen doubled down, putting together the highest paid team of all time with a team payroll in excess of 300 million with various penalties that will actually push it over 400m. The results have been disappointing, to say the least [the NY Mets are currently a sad 38-46 on the morning of July 3, 2023]. It will be very interesting to see how Cohen reacts to this poor result. It seems obvious that his first option will be to throw money at Shohei Ohtani. This has obvious parallels to Jacob Ruppert, owner of the New York Yankees, buying Babe Ruth from the Boston Red Sox way back in 1920. With Ruth, the Yankees dominated the American League throughout the 1920s. But Ruppert backed up his purchase of Ruth (and other star players) by building the farm system that allowed the Yanks to rule the League all the way down to 1964. If they do sign Ohtani, Steve Cohen will once again be doubling down on their current spend the bank strategy. But it will be even more interesting to see what happens if the Mets don’t win the Ohtani auction. Strangely, this may actually be bad news for the rest of the League. Without Ohtani, Steve Cohen may accelerate his building of a great analytically driven farm system like the Dodgers or Rays.

The New York Mets Future as Goliath?

While the Mets have struggled through a difficult 2023 season, Steve Cohen has said all the right things. Despite media personalities yelling and carrying on about how Cohen should punish the players for their poor performance, gut the team at the trading deadline, fire the manager and/or front office, and generally act like George Steinbrenner, Cohen has resisted the urge to pacify the idiot talking heads. He has remained calm and continued to send out a: “We will stay the course” message. This bodes well for the Mets future. If the best Major League Baseball owner possible would be one with: 1) an immense desire to win; 2) who spends money on premium free agents; and 3) invests his money in building the best possible farm system, Steve Cohen does not seem to be there yet. There have been no indications that the New York Mets have gone all in on building a Dodger-like farm system. The GM, Billy Eppler, seems like completely the wrong man for that particular job. But Steve Cohen has the possibility of becoming the next Jacob Ruppert. At this time, we may simply be seeing Cohen at the same stage as Jacob Ruppert was right before Ruppert bought Babe Ruth. If Cohen follows a similar path, the NY Mets may eventually be similar to the late 1930s led Joe DiMaggio Yanks.

Addendum #1

Major League Baseball Team Owners like to claim that the sport of baseball is not all that profitable. Their employee, the Commissioner of Baseball, parrots this propaganda pretty much whenever the Owners negotiate a new contract with the players or the owners are asked to pay for anything. Of course, this is simply a sound and a fury, signifying nothing other than the owner’s greed. Major League teams are obviously fantastically lucrative year after year (even probably during the 2020 Covid epidemic). However, the Owners do not have to just rely on their team’s annual income for their financial rewards. Owning a Major League Baseball teams also comes with a considerable financial asset appreciation when the owner finally sells. The transfers of the New York Mets’ ownership illustrate this perfectly. In 1986, Fred Wilpon & Nelson Doubleday, as equal 50/50 partners, purchased the NY Mets for $81.0 million dollars from the Doubleday Publishing Company (i.e. they each paid $40.5 million dollars for their share). In 2002, Doubleday sold his 50 percent share of the NY Mets to Wilpon for $391 million dollars. In other words, Fred Wilpon now owned the Mets in 2002 for an outlay of $431.5 million dollars. In 2020, Wilpon sold 95% of the Mets (keeping 5% for himself) to Steve Cohen for $2,400 million dollars (or 2.400 billion dollars). Even if the Mets had never made a dime of profit during all the Years that Wilpon owned the team, this is an return on investment that just boggles the mind. Basically, for Fred Wilpon, this was a 600% return over 18 years from 2002 to 2020. In other words, somewhere around a 30% annual return. Even Wilpon’s friend, Bernie Madoff, the Ponzi King, did not promise returns like this….

Post #30

Big Bill Smith [Part 2]: In his own words

All journeys have secret destinations of which the traveler is unaware.
Martin Buber

June 5, 2023

Introduction

In a previous post [see Post 27], I published the demographical information of William “Big Bill” Smith, a forgotten African American baseball player from the turn of the last century. Born in 1869, Bill Smith played various positions (first base, catcher, second base, and outfield) for many of the best Negro teams of the 1890s and 1900s, including the Cuban Giants, the Cuban X Giants, and the Brooklyn Royal Giants. He also was deeply involved with three short-lived top Black teams of this period: the oddly named 1906 Philadelphia Quaker Giants of New York, the 1910 New York Black Sox, and the 1913 Mohawk Giants from Schenectady, New York. Smith himself spoke several times about his career to newspaper reporters (usually while promoting himself and his current project or team). This post will reprint four of these articles to establish a basis for the further discussion of Big Bill Smith’s career. The first of these 4 articles is from the April 2, 1909, edition of the Nashville Globe, the colored (to use the term then applied) newspaper from Bill Smith’s home town. In 1907 and 1908, Bill had played for John M. Bright’s Cuban Giants team. But in 1909, Smith (who had just turned 40 years old) decided not to return to Bright’s club and try his luck playing for and managing his own club. Before the 1909 season started, he was considering starting a baseball team in Nashville, Tennessee. Big Bill talked about his plans with a Nashville Globe reporter:

Article #1: The Nashville Globe, Friday, April 2, 1909 [Page 8].

Mr. William Smith, an old Nashville boy, and better known around town as Serk Smith, is in the city, having just returned from Florida and Cuba, where he has had charge of a number of ball players during the winter season.  Mr. Smith is a man of wide experience in baseball, having been at the head of some of the leading Negro baseball teams in the country – such teams as the Cuban Giants, Cuban X Giants and Philadelphia Giants – and for the last fifteen years has given his attention to the game both as a player and a manager.  Mr. Smith has been working out every day during his stay here, getting ready for the hard season in the East.  When seen the other day by a Globe man Mr. Smith stated that he was surprised to find baseball at such a low tide in Nashville.  And that he had several good things in store provided the movement for a Negro park comes along all right.  He seems to think Nashville is a good baseball town and that a good team here with a park to play in would be a profitable investment.  He says the record Nashville has made in the world of baseball is one to be proud of and that whenever a ball player says he hails from the Rock City he is given a good chance to show what he can do.  When asked if he thought well of any of the talent around here he said that there was a world of good young ball players in Nashville and that he was thinking strongly of taking some of them with him if he did not decide to stay here and work up a good team.  He also stated that by mixing some older heads with the young blood already here he could mold out  a very fast team.  It is to be hoped Mr. Smith will remain in the city.  Such a man has been badly needed in Nashville and we should give Mr. Smith a world of encouragement and do all we can to help him.  Nashville needs baseball and that badly; here is wishing him success.

Bill Smith did form his new team in 1909: the Nashville Collegians. He kept his club playing around Nashville for its first month before barnstorming up north. But the team did not last out the year, evidently breaking up in July of 1909. In 1910, Smith would organize another new team, the New York Black Sox, with better financial backing. The Black Sox lasted out the 1910 season. For the 1911 and 1912 seasons, Bill Smith once again returned to the Cuban Giants. In 1913, Smith was contacted by one William “Bill” Wernecke, a white businessman from Schenectady, New York, for help forming and organizing a team called the “Mohawk Giants.” Before coming to town, Bill Smith talked to a news reporter for a local white newspaper, the Schenectady Gazette:

Article #2: The Schenectady Gazette, Friday, February 28, 1913 [Page 14]

[HEADLINE] “Big Bill” Smith, widely known Baseball Player and Member of Schenectady Club, in this city [PARAGRAPH 1]. W. T. Smith, better known in baseball as “Big Bill,” is in this city aiding William Warnecke in completing his schedule for the coming season.  Smith has been playing ball for eighteen years and is known by a majority of the league managers and by practically all managers of semi-professional teams in this section of the country.  His reputation as being absolutely on the level in all dealings will result in the Schenectady Colored club being booked with the foremost attractions, for the manager s know that Smith never misrepresents the true facts, and when he says this will be the highest paid colored club in the country, as well as the leading, he is telling no falsehood.  This will also be the first club of its kind to have mackinawa a part of the players’ uniforms. [PARAGRAPH 2] Smith will be the catcher of the local colored club.  He has been playing all winter at Palm Beach and arrived here yesterday in accordance with telegraphic request of Mr. Wernecke to help in arranging the schedule.  For the opening game to be played at Island Park, the second week in April, the Schenectady club hopes to oppose either the Utica or Syracuse State League team.  The managers of both teams have written for games for later in the month and it is expected that no trouble will be experienced in signing them a week earlier. [PARAGRAPH 3] As a ball player, Smith has a record that any leaguer might well feel proud of.  In 1903, while playing with the Royal Giants, he made 26 hits in 13 games and each was better than a single.  Seven were for the circuit of the bases.  Few, if any players in the country today, have established a better batting record in consecutive games. [PARAGRAPH 4] “Big Bill” stands 6 feet, 1 inch, and tips the scales at 240 pounds, which shows just why he received the nickname of being “Big.”  When but 16 years of age, he began his career with the Black Sox of St. Louis.  He organized the Brooklyn Royal Giants in 1905.  Later he joined the Cuban Giants and it was while with this colored aggregation that he received his best schooling.  In 1907 he came here with this team and played two games, defeating the Locos on a Saturday by the score of 16 to 6 and the Jeffs the next day by a score of 11 to 0.  Ben Ellis umpired these games.  In the game against the Jeffs, which then had “Bill” Cunningham” in their line up, Smith made three hits, one a three bagger, off Ketcham, and scored a like number of times.  In the other game he made two hits, one a two bagger, off Berger and Arnold, and scored one run. [PARAGRAPH 5] He is a graduate of Fisk university at Nashville, Tenn., which has been made famous by its jubilee singers.  In speaking of the team which Mr. Wernecke has organized, Mr. Smith said last night: “I can truthfully say that this is one of the best ever organized among colored players in the country.  I can see nothing but success for the team and I know that just as soon as it becomes generally known that Schenectady has the highest paid and leading team, that Mr. Wernecke will be swamped with applications for games.  If the players on this team were white, he would be unable to secure their services for less than $3,000 per month.

Interestingly, while this article contains much new and interesting information about Bill Smith’s life and baseball career, it also has an obvious falsehood. It asserts that Smith went on a complete batting rampage for the 1903 Brooklyn Royal Giants, smashing 26 extra base hits (including seven home runs) in just 13 games. But the Brooklyn Royal Giants were not formed until 1904 and Bill Smith did not play for them until 1905. However, a little research does confirm that Smith’s batting spree (or something close to it) did actually happen. Only it occurred in 1902 when Big Bill was playing for the Cuban X Giants. Also Bill Smith did not organize the Royal Giants either. He was hired by John Connor, the Royal Giants’ team’s owner, to manage and improve the club in its second year. Of course, the article reprinted here is the only one of the four that was written by a white reporter for a white newspaper (which may account for the sloppy reporting). Smith played for and managed the Schenectady Mohawk Giants through the 1913 season. In 1914, Smith re-organized the team (for a different owner Samuel Flansburgh), but this team disbanded in mid-season. Since John Bright had died in 1913, Bill Smith could not return to play for the Bright’s Cuban Giants. But, for the rest of 1914 into 1915, he did play for the remains of the Cuban Giants (teams made up of former Cuban Giants players which operated under various names but called themselves the Cuban Giants when no one was looking). Late in 1915, Big Bill Smith once again started his own club. He named his team the Chicago Black Sox (which just 4 years later would reverberate with historical irony). In August of 1915, the Chicago Black Sox played a series of games versus C. I. Taylor’s top-rated Indianapolis ABCs ballclub. This series likely changed the course of Big Bill Smith’s life.

In all probability, Bill Smith meet his future wife while his Chicago Black Sox played in Indianapolis. In any event, Smith apparently spent the 1915-1916 off-season in the Indiana city. He would settle down in Indianapolis and live the rest of his life there. But Bill Smith was not quite through with Baseball yet. In Smith’s scrapbook, there are two articles evidently clipped from an African American Indianapolis newspaper. The earlier of these two articles, almost surely from 1916, has a better summary of Bill Smith’s career than the 1913 Schenectady article. It even has a headshot photo of Bill himself. Smith was evidently planning on continuing his baseball career in his adopted city. In the article, Smith even hinted that he would be open to trying to form a league or organization with other Negro Baseball team owners and managers (four years before the great Rube Foster formed the actual first truly viable Negro National League). The unknown reporter did a great job outlining Big Bill Smith’s career and hinting at Smith’s future aspirations:

Article #3: 1916 Newspaper Clipping from Big Bill Smith’s Scrapbook at the Baseball Hall of Fame [probably from the the Indianapolis Freeman].

[HEADLINE] “Big Smithy” as a Factor in Base Ball. [SUB-HEADLINE] A Glimpse Into His Most Interesting Career On The Diamond Both As Manager and Player. [PARAGRAPH 1] W. T. Smith started his career in baseball at Fisk University, where, with Frank C. Leland (deceased), they formed the star battery.  In 1893 Smithy played his first professional game in New York with John M. Bright’s Cuban Giants.  In 1897, he joined the Cuban ex-Giants, with which team he played in every position.  In those days there were only three Colored teams in the United States, namely Cuban Giants, Chicago Unions and Cuban ex-Giants, and to fill a position on either team a player had to be mighty good.  In 1902 Smith weighed 230 pounds and could hit according to his size.  On a two weeks’ trip with the Cuban ex-Giants through Pennsylvania “Big Smithy” had twenty-eight hits – one single, ten doubles, eight triples and nine home runs, five of his home runs being made in two days, two at Roxborough and three at Morristown.  In 1905 Smith organized, manned and managed successfully the Brooklyn Royal Giants.  In 1910 he launched a sensational team of youngsters – the New York Black Sox.  No one on the team had ever been heard of except Mathews, the former Harvard University star, but they played great ball and defeated every team in the East.  Leroy, Grant, Handy, Crawford, Andrews and several stars of lesser light graduated from the Black Sox.  His best effort was the launching of the Mohawk Giants in Schenectady, N.Y., in 1914.  At that time the average attendance at Sunday games in Schenectady was 800.  With the advent of the Mohawks the average attendance jumped to 5,000 at Sunday games and 1,500 on Thursdays and Saturdays during July and August.  The Mohawks defeated Montreal, Utica, Elmira, Albany, Troy, Pittsfield, and Holyoke, all league teams, and Walter Johnson’s All-Americans, with Walter Johnson pitching.  Smith wired President Navin, of the Detroits, for a Sunday game, who wired: “Do not care to play exhibition games unless guaranteed a thousand dollars.”  Smith called Mr. Navin over the ’phone and agreed to send him a certified check for a thousand dollars if he would send Cobb and Crawford. On being informed he would have to play a Negro team, he declined the offer.  The Chicago Cubs accepted a Sunday date at Schenectady and notified Smith on Friday that they would not play a Colored team during their playing season.  The Rutland (Vt.) team was then engaged to play the game instead of the Mohawks.  Smith put Wickware in uniform to pitch for Rutland, but the Cubs would not play against him.  In writing of the affair, the New York Evening Telegram said: “The Chicago Cubs in an exhibition game with the Rutland Tri-State League team refused to go on the field when the latter tried to put a Negro pitcher in the box.  Drawing the color line is the acme of impertinence for a team that can bawl out umpires and opposing players in such finished yet uncouth manner as can the Cubs.” [PARAGRAPH 2] Smith is thoroughly familiar with baseball from all angles.  Seeing the time is now ripe for organized baseball among the Negroes, he has decided to take up the work in the West and to co-operate with all the managers and promoters for the organizing and uplift of Negro baseball.  He has already paved the way for another first-class team in the West by organizing the Chicago Black Sox, which team in their initial appearance defeated the crack A.B.C.’s two extra-inning games.  Let us hope that all managers and promoters pull together and adopt the proper methods and the success of Negro baseball is assured.

Despite his hopes and dreams, Bill Smith was pretty much at the end of his baseball career. Smith was evidently out of Baseball for the 1916 season. In Indianapolis, the ABC club fractured into two different teams: one directed by C.I. Taylor, the 1915 club’s manager; and another controlled by Tom Bowser, the 1915 team’s owner. For the 1916 season, these two Indianapolis ABCs teams fought for supremacy in the Indianapolis market. Interestingly, Taylor, the African American manager, won out over Bowser, the White owner. After the 1916 season, Bowser sold his ABC club to Warner Jewell (another White businessman). In 1917, information about Bill Smith appeared once again in the same Indianapolis newspaper (using the exact same headshot as the 1916 article). Basically, this 1917 article is a retirement announcement by Smith. But Big Bill also very obviously uses it to get some free publicity for his new vocation:

Article #4: 1917 Newspaper Clipping from Big Bill Smith’s Scrapbook at the Baseball Hall of Fame [probably from the the Indianapolis Freeman].

[HEADLINE] Ex-Baseball Manager Becomes Contracting Painter In This City. [PARAGRAPH] William T. Smith, one of the well known baseball managers, has located permanently in Indianapolis and has become a contracting painter.  “Big Smithy” as he was called by ball players, comes of a family of painters who are well known throughout the south where they conduct large businesses along that line. Mr. Smith has managed successfully several of the big colored ball clubs at various times, and when he first came to the city a few weeks ago, it was generally surmised that he was to take the managerial end of the Jewell A.B.C.’s.

With this announcement of his retirement, Bill Smith’s baseball career came to pretty much an end. However, his name would be mentioned several times in the future when Negro Baseball in Indianapolis was at a crossroads. In 1926, the Negro National League was trying to re-establish the Indianapolis ABCs as a viable club (the club had slowly disintegrated following C.I. Taylor’s death in 1922). William T. Smith was mentioned for lending a helping hand. In 1937, the first year of the Negro American League, the new organization also tried to start up an new team in Indianapolis (naming it the “Athletics” rather than ABCs), Once again, William T. Smith was mentioned as helping out. However, for all intents and purposes, all Bill Smith’s experiences in his long and storied baseball career found no outlet after he stopped playing in 1915. In general, the Negro Leagues (and the larger world of Blackball itself) had unfortunately very few opportunities for its veterans to continue their careers at the top.

Conclusions

Using this four articles and his obituary from the Indianapolis Recorder, [see Post 27], it is now possible to write a pretty good biography for Big Bill Smith. William T. Smith was born in Nashville, Tennessee, in the year 1869. His family ran a Painting Contractor business and was relatively well-off. Smith attended Fisk University, an African American college in Nashville. There Bill Smith was a baseball star with his battery mate Frank C. Leland. Of course, Frank Leland was instrumental from 1887 until 1901 for the success of the Chicago Unions, one of the era’s top Black teams. After 1901, Leland continued to run various Chicago Clubs (Chicago Union Giants, Chicago Leland Giants, and finally just Chicago Giants) until his death in 1914. Bill Smith began his baseball career in 1885, when he was just 16, with the St. Louis Black Sox. Big Bill Smith turned professional in 1893 with the Cuban Giants. In 1897, Smith joined the Cuban X Giants. In 1902, Smith was at the peak of his abilities for the X Giants. In 1905, he managed the Brooklyn Royal Giants. In 1906, he built the New York Quaker Giants. In 1910, he handled the New York Black Sox. In 1913, Smith was hired to run the Schenectady Mohawk Giants. Finally in 1915, Bill Smith founded the Chicago Black Sox. After retiring, Smith settled in Indianapolis & was a painting contractor himself until about 1926. In 1936 or so, Bill Smith opened a male social club called the “Wagon Wheel” in Indianapolis. In 1940, William T. Smith died of cancer. Of course, this obituary needs to be fleshed out but it hits most of the highlights… except for one.

All of the current biographies of Big Bill Smith credit him with playing for the Chicago Unions from around 1891 to 1898. However, in the four articles that are reprinted above (and his obituary also), there is only one mention of the Chicago Unions and that reference simply states that the Unions were one of the three top African American teams in the 1890s.* It is incontrovertible that a William Smith played for the Chicago Unions during this time period. And it makes perfect sense that Bill Smith would travel to Chicago and play for Frank Leland, his old friend and battery mate from Fisk University. So why didn’t Big Bill Smith list the Chicago Unions as one of the teams that he played for? This question will be the subject of our next post about Big Bill Smith.

*Of course, there were not just three top teams in the 1890s. Early on, there were the Cuban Giants, the New York Gothams, and York Colored Monarchs. Later on, there were the Chicago Unions, Cuban Giants (once again), Cuban X Giants, and Page Fence Giants [Chicago Columbia Giants after 1899]. There was also, briefly in 1893, the Boston Monarchs.

Post #29

2023 Franchise Review [Number 3]: Atlanta Braves (2022 Record: 101-61)

Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature. Helen Keller

May 7, 2023

1. Introduction*

From 2017 to 2021, Baseball fans got to watch the bloated remains of Albert Pujols and Miguel Cabrera stumble through season after season. Each player was: 1) very obviously not in the best of playing shape; and 2) not worthy of their hefty contacts during this time period. Against all odds, Pujols went out in an improbable blaze of glory in 2022, retiring after one last monster season to remind everyone of his greatness. Cabrera was not so lucky. His dreadful 2022 season should have finally put his comatose career out of its blubbering misery. However, since he is still owed 32 million dollars to play in 2023, the Detroit Tigers decided not to get their money’s worth….. one…. more…. time (a truly odd decision). Each man was playing out the end of a contract that paid them deep into their 30s. Their fading years stand as a testimony to the folly of such long-term contacts. Seemingly not learning much from past mistakes of this sort, Major League teams have been recently giving out contracts that will actually cover players into their early 40s. Will these contracts, which are really designed to circumvent harsh penalties for having an excessive payroll, still seem like a good strategy when the players are actually in their 40s? Only time will tell (but it doesn’t look good). On the other hand, some of the more progressive Major League front offices have been trying to tie down their best players through their productive 20s and into their early 30s. Although they did not invent this particular strategy, the Atlanta Braves have implemented it to a unprecedented degree. This post will discuss two aspects of this type of team blueprint: 1) Was it wise for the Braves to sign virtually their entire player core to contracts of this sort; and 2) What would be the economic impact on Baseball itself if this strategy is followed to its logical conclusion?

*As I already wrote a long post specifically about the Atlanta Braves [Post #19], this post will try [and probably fail] not to be so specific to the team itself.

2. The Atlanta Braves’ Bright Idea

The Atlanta Braves have signed seven of the team’s young core to long-term contracts before they would have been eligible for free agency (in some cases, way before) after playing in the Majors for six years. These types of contracts give the players immediate financial security, but at the expense of eventually trying to maximize their value on the open market. The team gets both cost control and good publicity with the added bonus of a chance for an economic killing (to be able to pay a player far under his actual worth). Of course, there is always the possibility that the team could end up paying a player far more than he deserves too. Jon Singleton serves as a cautionary tale for overpaying a player. He was signed by the Astros to a long-term contract before he even established himself as a Major Leaguer. His career was derailed by a runaway marijuana addiction; and he was never worth a penny that the team paid. Do the Braves have a potential Singleton in their 7 player signed core? The quick answer is, of course, possibly Spencer Strider. He is the only pitcher and thus just a torn ligament or burst rotator cuff from becoming a shell of his present self. Sean Murphy, the Braves’ catcher, also is part of a group that often has their careers curtailed by injuries. Both Ronald Acuna Jr. & Ozzie Albies have already lost seasons to injuries; but also seem to have recovered without any lingering problems. Injuries often beget injuries though. But the Braves have extremely team friendly contracts for both men too. The two sluggers, Matt Olson and Austin Riley, are both signed until they are 35 (with team options for their 36th years). Sluggers like them often fade suddenly in their early 30s. Finally, there has been some chatter that Michael Harris II may turn out to be the second coming of Claudell Washington.* Even if he does, the Braves still win that scenario. But, even if two or possibly three of these seven contracts are total duds, the Braves will still win. By signing so many core players, they have (in insurance terms) spread the risk. Every Major League Baseball club should be trying to copy this strategy.

*Claudell Washington debuted in 1974 at age 19 with the Oakland As. He hit .285 in 221 ABs with an OPS+ of 108 [a measure of offensive production, Major League Average=100]. In 1975 at age 20, Washington hit 10 HRs, 77 RBIs, a .308 BA, 40 SBs, a 118 OPS+ and 4.9 WAR [Wins above replacement]. But that was his peak, he never got any better. However, he also played regularly until 1989 and was last seen in the Major Leagues at age 35 in 1990.

3. The Economic Impact of this Strategy

One very interesting aspect of the Baseball team strategy of signing up their young players to long-term contracts has not really been discussed (as far as I know). This practice will definitely effect free agency itself. Basically, the free agent market has been used by teams to improve themselves quickly since it was introduced in the late 1970s. But what happens if this market dries up to a certain extent? What happens if all (or almost all) of the best young players have been tied up by long-term contracts and the free agent market contains only those guys being sent to the Island of Misfit Toys? In the last off-season [2022-2023], it seemed like every star shortstop in the Majors was available as a free agent. Teams were able to go browsing or be caught short by window shopping too long. But many writers have already noted that the coming off-season [2023-2024] has a notably thin free agent class (essentially it’s Shohei Ohtani and some random guys). If the free agent market does dry up, will the free agents available be rewarded handsomely with more lucrative contracts? What will this do to team dynamics? What happens if you are the best player on a team but some guy signed in free agency is making twice what you are because you were convinced to sign away your free agency rights early on? It seems like the Atlanta Braves may already have this problem. The team has a obvious salary structure now.* Would the Braves sign a player in free agency who made significantly more than any of their players that have been tied up long-term? Interestingly, one player the Braves have not signed long-term is Max Fried, their ace pitcher [or, at least, he was until Strider showed up]. Fried has show no inclination to sell himself short and repeatedly fought the Braves in arbitration. Like Freddie Freeman and Dansby Swanson before him, he will obviously have to get paid in free agency. If the strategy of signing all of the best talent to early contracts is taken to the logical extreme, Baseball will end up with set teams fighting one another to overpay for the geriatric scraps that can put them over the top (much like the current Mets contracts for both Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander).

*The Braves have, for now, evidently set a salary ceiling of 22 million dollars a year. Matt Olson (in 2024), Austin Riley (in 2025) and Spencer Strider (in 2027) all eventually top out at this number. It will be interesting to see how long the Braves can hold this particular line.

Post #28

2023 Franchise Review [Number 2]: Houston Astros (2022 Record: 106-56)

April 5, 2023

Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground – James Taylor [from the song “Fire and Rain”]

Editorial Comment

As a “writing exercise” for 2023, I decided that I would try to write a “brief” essay for each Major League Baseball team. These essays would be in order of the team’s 2022 records. The very first essay, for the 111-win Los Angeles Dodgers, was not brief. I promised myself that I would do better. For the 2nd essay, the 105-win Houston Astros, I first read a whole book about the team. This was hardly conducive to knocking out these 30 posts briefly and quickly. Once again, the essay was far too long; and more than two months elapsed between the team posts. At this rate, the final essay [Washington Nationals] will be published in 2025. I either need to get better at this or maybe skip a boring team or two.

1. The Houston Astros & Corporate Culture

The book Winning Fixes Everything (by Evan Drellich) was published recently. Basically, it is an expose on the corporate culture of the Houston Astros. This culture possibly led to a sign stealing scandal that tarnished the Astro’s 2017 World Series victory. The book, if one is interested in the analytical side of the game of baseball, is fascinating. Drellich’s story even serves as a bookend to a much more well-known book about baseball: Moneyball by Michael Lewis. Moneyball is, at its heart, a story about the conflict between a bunch of jocks and nerds. It is a latter day high school story where the nerds tear down the social structure of a jock society.* But the hero of the book is the Oakland A’s general manager, Billy Beane, a former jock. He opens the doors to his team’s corporate boardrooms to the nerds. With the help of the nerds, Beane finally becomes successful. In the end, Beane received what had been denied to him in his athletic career (despite formidable talent). It is a redemption tale and Hollywood loved the plot so much that it was made into a movie (starring the ridiculously handsome Brad Pitt as the jock turned nerd hero). No one will be turning Winning Fixes Everything into a Hollywood movie. Unlike Lewis’ book, the plot of Everything is scattershot. Lewis threw out anything that did not fit his main thesis (like how much of the Oakland A’s success was simply due to its great pitching staff). Drellich, the author of Everything, throws everything and anything about the Astros into his book. However, his main thesis, that the corporate culture of the Astros led directly to the sign-stealing scandal, is actually weak. The low tech of watching a TV and banging on a trash can was basically the player’s initiative. The analytically obsessed Astro executive team simply looked the other way once they knew it was happening. All that being said, the book Everything has, in some ways, an even more fascinating story to tell than the much more famous Moneyball.

* There is a whole series of movies, “Revenge of the Nerds” from the 1980s and 1990s, based on this exact same premise.

Winning Fixes Everything tells the tale of Jeff Luhnow, the general manager of the Houston Astros from 2012 to 2019. He began his professional career as a corporate consultant. Of course, consultant is simply another term for a “killer nerd.” As a consultant, Luhnow advised corporations how to restructure their business practices. This restructuring was usually accomplished by laying-off employees without any regard for sentimentality. A Baseball fan, Luhnow sent his resume to Major League teams when the Moneyball revolution swept thru the sport. Many clubs were trying to duplicate the success of Billy Beane and the Oakland A’s. Hired by the St. Louis Cardinals as their head nerd, Luhnow was their vice-president in charge of analytics from 2003 to 2011. On May 16, 2011, the last place Houston Astros were purchased by Jim Crane, a shipping magnate. Crane, who relied deeply on logistics (i.e. analytics) in his primary business, hired Luhnow to be his General Manager (GM). Now in full charge of a team, he quickly decimated the team’s “jock” employees and bought in a platoon of his analysts. Everything tells the fascinating story of this process, in which even the original “analysts” hired by Luhnow were quickly replaced by better analysts. The results were preposterously good. The Astros, who had lost over 100 games yearly from 2011 to 2013, were a winning team by 2015, won their first World Series in 2017, won over 100 games each season from 2017 to 2019, but lost the 2019 World Series in the seventh and penultimate game. After Luhnow was banished from Baseball as a result of the scandal, the Astros continued to win, losing the World Series in 2021 and then winning a second title in 2022. Despite his fantastic record as a Baseball GM, Luhnow will almost surely never run a Major League Baseball team again.*

*It probably doesn’t help that Jeff Luhnow has sued Jim Crane and the Houston Astros for 22 million dollars (the remainder of his contract).

On the one hand, Luhnow’s banishment is nothing to get upset about. By all accounts, he had the interpersonal skills of a bad-tempered badger. The fact that he was fired in much the same way that he fired people himself feels like karma. However, it is also true that Luhnow was scapegoated because he had no real friends in the world of Baseball. The real culprits went scott-free. The players were given “immunity to testify” by the powers that be. But, in reality, the Commissioner’s Office simply did not want to take on the Player’s Union. The Commissioner himself, guilty of not proactively policing and preventing the scandal itself, skated free. Crane – the Astro’s owner with a sordid past of allegations of racism, misogyny, and even “war-profiteering” against his main business – was absolved of responsibility by his employee, the Commissioner. Luhnow (along with manager A. J. Hinch and coach Alex Cora) was banished from Baseball for a year. But while Hinch and Cora were quickly re-employed after their year was up, Luhnow did not get a single offer. With Luhnow gone, Astro’s owner Crane hired yet another analytics oriented GM, James Click, to run his team. Click maintained the run of good seasons from 2020 to 2022. But Crane was not clicking with Click. For 2023, the Houston Astros have yet another GM, Dana Brown. Unlike Luhnow and Click, Brown does not belong to the nerd brigade that has taken over the sport of Baseball. A former minor league player and college teammate of Astro Hall of Famer Craig Biggio, he is squarely part of the jock blue bloods that usually run Major League teams. It seems as if Astro owner Jim Crane has changed the team’s course away from hardcore analytics. What does all this mean for the future of the defending World Champion Houston Astros?

The answer to that question is probably grim. The current Houston Astro’s team was built on analytics and the high draft picks that come from being a lousy team. Except for their 29-31 record in the Covid scuttled 2020 season, the Astros have not had a losing season since 2014. Not only that, the Astros lost draft picks as a result of the sign stealing scandal. Most well-publicized current farm system rankings list the Astro’s organization at the bottom, if not dead last, amongst all 30 Major League teams. The chances that the Astros can reload their Major League team from below are slim. The current team still has the strengths the led them to the 2022 Championship: a very strong pitching staff (both starting and relieving) and formidable line-up. However, pitchers are inherently fragile and the line-up is aging. After the 2024 season, Jose Altuve and Alex Bregman, both probably future Hall of Famers, are slated to become free agents. They could be resigned. But each will be in their 30s for those contracts. Without them, the line-up will no longer be formidable. With them, the line-up will be declining. The traditional front office response to a strong team with a weak or absent farm system is to bring in free agents to shore up the core. An analytical front office would tear the team down (i.e. tanking) and rebuild with draft picks and prospects acquired in the teardown. The corporate culture of the Houston Astros has almost certainly gone from analytical to traditional. Probably the most telling roster move made by the Houston Astros during the 2022/23 off-season was the signing of free agent first baseman Jose Abreu. The acquisition of a 36-year-old first baseman as your quintessential off-season move screams traditional.

It is almost certainly now just a question of player health until the Houston Astro dynasty from 2017 to 2022 comes crashing down to the ground and leaves nothing but wreckage. With good health, the Astros will probably still be strong contenders in 2023 and 2024. But sometime after that, the tide of time and the inevitable wear and tear on any pitching staff will take the Astros down to the bottom of the standings. They may stay there for quite awhile.

2. Jose Abreu & the Baseball Hall of Fame

For several years before Jose Abreu escaped from Cuba in 2013 (with various family members in a boat ride to Haiti), articles were written claiming that he was either: a) the best hitter not in the Major Leagues; b) the best hitter alive; or c) Babe Ruth reincarnated. In the end, all this hyperbole turned out to be just a trifle over-baked. Although he has not turned into the 2nd coming of the Babe himself, Abreu established himself as a very good hitter once he was in the Major Leagues. From 2014 to 2022, he compiled 31.8 bWAR.* Born in 1987, Abreu is now 36 years old. With a good finishing kick, he will probably end up with somewhere around 40 WAR for his career. This will leave Abreu short of the 50 WAR or so that it takes to make a good Baseball Hall of Fame argument. Should he be given any credit for what might have been? Abreu debuted in the Cuban National League in 2003 at the reported age of 16 (if that age is incorrect, the window for a nice finishing kick is probably shorter). Abreu was probably not a Major League caliber hitter until 2008. In the USA, he would have, if given the chance, broken into the Major Leagues then and definitely been a regular from 2009 to 2013 (his age 22 to 26 seasons). How many more WAR would Jose Abreu have compiled in those five seasons? A conservative estimate would be 15 or so [from 2014 to 2018, Abreu amassed 19.3 WAR]. If that had happened, Abreu would now be sitting on about 46 or 47 career bWAR. He wouldn’t need a good finishing kick to simply get into a Hall of Fame discussion; it would give him a worthy Hall of Fame case just on his Major League merits. There are several other Cuban and Japanese players that could make similar arguments if given the chance. It will be interesting to see if Abreu’s Cuban career is considered when he eventually comes up for Hall of Fame consideration. It is probably more likely that he will be a “one & done” candidate, falling off future ballots after not receiving the required five percent to stay on until his election or the 10 year limit runs out.

* Baseball Reference’s Wins Above Replacement formula.

3. Dusty Baker & Clubhouse Culture

The year 2022 was probably the apex of Dusty Baker’s career. After 25 years of managing Major League Baseball teams, Baker finally won a World Series Championship. His passport to the Baseball Hall of Fame has been stamped. Many anecdotes have been told about his managerial style. All these stories seem to agree that the secret to Baker’s success was the “clubhouse culture” that he created. His men just loved playing for him. Perhaps the best thing about this was that it was unquantifiable. In the sport where everything gets measured, Baker’s strength as a manager was virtually abstract. The annual “Bill James Handbook” always contains various measurements of managerial tendencies such as: their number of line-up changes, use of player platoons, quick or slow hooks removing starting pitchers, use of relievers, number of intentional walks given, preference for left-right or right-left batter/pitcher match-ups, partiality for either rookies or veterans, and even a bias for either speed or power. However, baseball analyst/historian Bill James himself has admitted that the tools used to rate managers are inadequate. How do you measure what is obviously a manager’s greatest strength or weakness: the ability to foster a clubhouse culture that lets the players win? Back in 1997, James wrote an entire book just about baseball managers. In that book, he told the story of Hall of Fame manager Joe McCarthy and Hall of Famer Hack Wilson. Wilson originally came up to the Major Leagues in 1923 with the New York Giants. But he did not thrive under the dictatorial Giant manager John McGraw. Traded to the Chicago Cubs, Wilson played for McCarthy from 1926 to 1930. For McCarthy, Wilson had great year after great year, culminating in his monstrous 1930 season (56 HR, 191 RB1, .356 BA). Joe McCarthy was then replaced as Cubs manager by Rogers Hornsby, a man with no tact at all. Hack Wilson’s career fell apart and he was out of the Major Leagues by 1934.

James hypothesized that McCarthy had created the “clubhouse culture” that allowed the free-spirited alcohol-loving Wilson to thrive. In other words, he maximized the value of Wilson to his team. Of course, no baseball manager can perfectly maximize a complete roster of baseball players (traditionally 25 men but currently 26). However, a great manager needs to ensure that his best players are able to focus on winning.* There is some actual proof that Dusty Baker may be good at this. From 1992 to 1996, second baseman Jeff Kent played for various teams, primarily the New York Mets. For the Mets, he played for manager Dallas Green, a dictatorial man with no tact. Defensively challenged, Kent put extreme pressure on himself to perform well. The teams and managers whom he performed for openly doubted his talent. In 1997, Kent was traded to the San Francisco Giants, managed since 1993 by Dusty Baker. Baker simply told Jeff Kent to relax, that he believed in him. In 1997, Kent had a very good season with 29 HRs and 121 RBIs. But he hit for just a .250 BA. Baker continued to build Kent up, make him feel secure. From 1998 until Baker was fired by the Giants in 2002, Jeff Kent was a monster, including seasons of 31-128-.297 in 1998, 33-125-.334 in 2000 winning the league MVP, and 37-108-.313 in 2002. Jeff Kent had basically all his best years playing for Dusty Baker. Unlike Hack Wilson, Kent did not fade quickly after his favorite manager left the club in 2002. He was still good from 2003 to 2008 when he retired at age 40. The Baseball Writers Association of America [BBWAA], who vote players into the Hall of Fame, recently dropped Kent from the ballot after he reached the ten year limit for. The argument for electing Kent raged on for that entire time. If he had played his entire career for Dusty Baker, it is likely that there would have been no argument at all. Jeff Kent would have sailed into the Baseball Hall of Fame without a glitch.

*Hall of Fame Baseball Manager Casey Stengel famously said that: The secret of successful managing is to keep the five guys who hate you away from the four guys who haven’t made up their minds.

Post #27

Negro League Demographics: Post #1 Big Bill Smith [Part 1]

The light of other days is faded, and all their glories past. Alfred Bunn

March 27, 2023

The field of Negro League Demographics may be the “final frontier” of Major League Biographical Research.* The Society for American Baseball Research [SABR], and its Biographical Research Committee in particular, have worked diligently to fill in every nook and cranny of Major League Demographics. By the end of the 2022 season, 20603 men had appeared in the traditional (non-Negro League) Major Leagues. Of these men, 37 players are missing their 1st name. Just 152 players (of those presumed deceased) are missing info about where and when they died. Only 474 players are missing birth information. And virtually all of these players with missing biographical data played very briefly in the Major Leagues. Many years ago, when I first became a Baseball fan, great chunks of this data was missing. I remember well the search for the remains of Benjamin Rippay (aka Charlie Jones), the very first National League triple crown winner (in 1879). His death data was eventually found, hiding in plain site. Basic information on all sorts of important and noteworthy players was just absent. Now, diligent SABR members are hunting down the marginal guys. With their great work seemingly almost completely done, Major League Baseball [MLB] itself decided to throw these SABR researchers a curveball. On December 16th of 2020, MLB announced that, henceforth, the teams of seven Negro Leagues, from 1920 to 1948, would be considered Major League clubs. On the one hand, this was an honor totally overdue. On the other hand, this overdue inclusion was a logistical nightmare, especially demographically.

*Apologies for the offhand Star Trek reference, I couldn’t help myself. I would hardly be considered a Trekkie, but it fit perfectly.

The Conundrum of Negro League Demographics

From the National and Union Associations to the Federal League right up to the present, there is a box score for every game ever played in the traditional Major Leagues. This is not true for the Negro Leagues. There will always be missing box scores for games in the newly seven Major Negro Leagues. This means that there are Major League/Negro League players from these circuits who will always be unknown. The worst teams in the historic Major Leagues (other than perhaps the Union Association) were still of Major League caliber (better than all but the best Minor and Independent baseball teams of their times). However, there were lots of Negro teams, not included in the seven newly minted Major Negro Leagues, that were of much better quality than the worst teams in the new Major Negro Leagues (especially the now Major 1932 Negro Southern League). The great Negro teams that played before 1920 are simply forgotten despite the fact that many of these clubs would simply wipe the floor with the worst teams (and some of the best too) from the now Major Negro Leagues. In addition to all this, Negro league player demographics are geometrically much more difficult than the player demographics of the classic Major Leagues. Primary sources, such as newspapers, are seriously lacking. A classic Major League club was covered by multiple daily major newspapers. A Negro League team usually had one weekly African-American newspaper that covered it (with just passing references in the daily white papers). There is a very good chance that death data for Dave Brown (the great African-American pitcher who went on the lamb from murder charges) will never ever be found. This would not be true of a white classic Major League murder suspect. Such a player would never have escaped the clutches of his crime. It would have followed him through the press until his conviction or absolution.

Praising the Seamheads Negro League Database

There is an old lawyer joke that goes: “What do you call 1000 dead lawyers on the bottom of the Ocean? [Answer: “A good start.”] In the last ten years, the website Seamheads has developed a Negro Leagues database that was all but inconceivable when Robert Peterson’s book “Only The Ball Was White” revived interest in the Negro Leagues, way back in the 1970s. Seamheads has made a lot more than just a good start on missing Negro League Demographics. But there is still a lot of missing information for important and noteworthy Negro League players. For my post today, I will be discussing just such a player. His name was William Smith, but he was much more commonly known during his playing career as “Big Bill.” Anyone who has done demographic research will probably flinch at the very thought of tracking down someone named William Smith. Other than perhaps John Jones or Bob Brown, there may be no worse name to try to research without any clue where to start. Fortunately, there are clues for Big Bill Smith. For one thing, the Baseball Hall of Fame actually has a scrapbook evidently compiled by Big Bill himself.* In the scrapbook, there are lots of clues, including a couple of short newspaper biographies of Bill Smith. In these bios, it is stated that Bill Smith was born in Nashville, Tennessee. The Hall of Fame even has demographic information for a William Smith, born in 1869 at Tennessee, and also died there in 1939, who they believe is the right man. The Seamheads database, perhaps relying on the Hall of Fame file, lists Bill Smith as being born in 1869 at Nashville too. Strangely enough, despite the fact that the Hall of Fame has data on the wrong William Smith, the info is actually correct. “Big Bill” Smith was born in 1869 at Nashville, Tennessee. But he died in 1940 at Indianapolis, Indiana.

*Many thanks to Claudette Scrafford of the Baseball Hall of Fame for, long ago, making me a copy of the Big Bill Smith scrapbook.

The Obituaries of Big Bill Smith

Just like old Benjamin Rippay (aka Charlie Jones), William “Big Bill” Smith was hiding in plain site all along. The Pittsburgh Courier, a national weekly African American newspaper is one of the primary (along with the Chicago Defender) newspapers for Negro League research. In the Saturday, October 19th, 1940 edition of the Pittsburgh Courier, the newspaper published the following obit for Big Bill Smith:

Ex-Ball Player Dies. Indianapolis, Ind., Oct. 17 – William Turner Smith, known in the baseball world as “Big Smithy,” died last Thursday at his home, 422 W. 26th street. Mr. Smith was 69 years old. A native of Nashville, Tenn., Mr. Smith was a graduate of Fisk University. He entered professional baseball in 1893 as a catcher. In 1905 he organized the Brooklyn Royal Giants, the New York Black Sox in 1910, and the Mohawk Giants in 1914.

A nice simple and concise obituary. William “Big Bill” Smith died on October 10, 1940, at Indianapolis, Indiana. Of course, Indianapolis had its own weekly African American newspaper, the Indianapolis Recorder. The Recorder had a slightly more substantial obituary:

Wm. T. Smith, Wagon Wheel Operator, Dies. William Turner Smith, ex-baseball player and manager of national fame, and operator of the well-known local Hotel Men’s club or the “Wagon Wheel,” 561 West Twenty-sixth street, died here Thursday, October 10th, at 7:45a.m., at his home, 422 West Twenty-sixth street. “Smitty,” as he was locally known, had been ill since June of this year. He was sixty-seven years of age. A native of Nashville, Tenn., he began his career at sixteen when he was a heavy hitter for a Fisk university teams [sic]. In 1905, “Big Bill,” as he was called in baseball circles, organized the Brooklyn Royal Giants. He later became nationally known as a catcher and batter, and played with leading colored teams of the day including the Cuban Giants, Cuban X Giants, Schenectady Colored Baseball club and the Black Sox of St. Louis. Perhaps his greatest claim to baseball fame lay in his managerial work with the New York Black Sox Baseball association. Mr. Smith came to Indianapolis twenty-three years ago when he began a career as a painting contractor. Coming from a family of painters who were well-known in southern areas, Mr. Smith worked here in that field for about ten years. Failing eye-sight forced him out of the business. Approximately four years ago, he became the proprietor of the Hotel Men’s club or the “Wagon Wheel,” which has been greatly patronized by local citizens. An honorary member of the Elks lodge and Coalese club, Mr. Smith was affiliated with the Christian Science services for him were held Saturday, October 12, at 2 p.m.. at the residence. Surviving Mr. Smith are a widow, Mrs. Marguerite Smith; a daughter, Miss Thelma Smith of New York City; a brother, John Smith of Cleveland, O.; an aunt, Mrs. Alice Rogan; two nieces and five nephews. The Herbert C. Willis mortuary was in charge. Burial was in Crown Hill cemetery.

Complete Demographic Information for Big Bill Smith

Demographics always reminds me of the children’s game Jenga. In this game, you build a tower with wooden blocks. The goal is to create a stable structure that will not collapse if blocks are removed. In demographics, a new piece of data often contradicts another and then all your theories collapse like a house of cards. But finding absolute proof of birth or death? That is like building a Jenga tower with a steel reinforced frame. With William “Big Bill” Smith’s date and place of death confirmed, the next step is to order his death certificate to see if more information can be gleaned. Bill Smith’s death certificate lists his date of birth as January 30, 1873 and place of birth as Tennessee. His parents’ names are listed as Isaiah Smith and Parthena Thompson. His cause of death is listed as cancer. Most interestingly, Bill Smith’s race is listed as “white.” two pieces of this information on this death certificate are incorrect (or perhaps, at least, partially true). First, “Big Bill” Smith was bi-racial. In census after census, he is listed as a “Mulatto,” the term of that time for bi-racial. Secondly, a little census research quickly reveals that William Smith was certainly born in 1869, not 1873. This completes the basic demographic research into our subject: William Turner Smith (aka “Big Bill” or alternatively just “Big” and also “Big Smitty” or “Big Smithy” occasionally; also, in his younger days, “Serk” and, at one time, “Home Run”); Born January 30, 1869, at Nashville, Tennessee; Died October 10, 1940, at Indianapolis, Indiana [Age 71 at time of death].

Future Posts

Of course, this demographic information is simply the skeleton for the tall tale of “Big Bill” Smith. In future posts, I will try to flesh his story out by answering such questions as: 1) How long and for whom did Bill Smith play Baseball; 2) How good a Baseball Player was Bill Smith; and even 3) Actually how big was Bill Smith? If you have never heard of “Big Bill” Smith, the answers to some of these questions may genuinely surprise you. Bill Smith was a very noteworthy player indeed.

Post #26

The 2023 BBWAA Hall of Fame Election Results: Part 1 [Public Versus Anonymous Votes]

It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future. Yogi Berra [although it is claimed that many of his quotes were actually made up by sportswriters]

February 11th, 2023

A Correct but Faulty Prediction

On January 24th of 2023, the Hall of Fame elected Scott Rolen to the Baseball Hall of Fame. Two weeks previously, on January 11th, this Blog stated that the Baseball Hall of Fame Tracker (compiled by Ryan Thibodaux) had reduced this election to the simple question of: Will Scott Rolen be elected?* As predictions go, this seems to have been pretty solid. But real life is never quite that clean. When this prediction was made, it was also asserted that Rolen was probably the only candidate with any chance of being elected. At that time, the Hall of Fame Tracker had collected 154 ballots. Scott Rolen had been named on 125 of them. Todd Helton, in second place, had been named on 123. On second thought, any predictions based on that sample should have been taken with a boulder-sized grain of salt. Rolen and Helton were essentially tied. Between January 11th and January 24th, Rolen and Helton eventually swapped places. On January 23rd, Helton led Rolen 149 to 147 votes with 186 ballots counted [177 public & 9 unverified ballots]. When the actual results were released the very next day, Rolen had regained the lead on the HOF Tracker with 167 votes to 163 for Helton [207 ballots total]. But, in the actual results, Rolen received 297 votes and Helton collected just 281 [of 389 total]. Scott Rolen’s four vote lead on the Tracker had ballooned to 16 votes in the actual election. He was the only player elected. The prediction was only true because Rolen got more of the anonymous votes, which the HOF Tracker cannot count, than Helton. In other words, it was correct but faulty. Is there anything to be learned from the differences between the 207 public ballots that were counted before the election by the HOF Tracker and the 182 anonymous ballots? This post will take a look at these differences & then make an attempt to explaining them. In 2 future posts, some suggestions will be made to a) change the BBWAA HOF voting process and b) make some needed adjustments to the entire Baseball Hall of Fame election process itself.

*See Post #24

The Public versus the Anonymous Hall of Fame Voters

There were a few underlying assumptions behind the January 11th prediction. One was that the Baseball Hall of Fame [HOF] Tracker compiles the ballots of the more liberal wing of the Baseball Writers Association of America [BBWAA]. In 2023, the HOF Tracker collected 207 of the eventual 389 ballots cast before the election (194 attributed & 13 unverified).* Basically, the Tracker compiled the votes of slightly more than half of all the eligible BBWAA voters before the election. It was presumed that writers who release their ballots to the public are more liberal than the writers who kept their votes anonymous (even if it is just until the election is actually over). But is this really true? Allowing public scrutiny does not necessarily equate to being a more liberal person. Another assumption made by the prior post was that the published voters were more interested in modern statistical analysis (Wins Above Replacement, aka WAR, etc); while the anonymous voters would be more interested in traditional but discredited stats such as games won for pitchers and runs batted in [RBIs] for batters. But is this also true? Yet another assumption made by the prior post was that anonymous voters believe in the Small Hall of Fame argument. This argument states that the Baseball Hall of Fame honor should be reserved only for the very greatest players: Babe Ruth, Willie Mays, Walter Johnson, Satchel Paige, etc. Scott Rolen type players need not apply. Behind this assumption is an actual fact. In previous elections, BBWAA HOF election candidates have had their vote percentages diminish appreciably as the anonymous votes are counted. But is this Small HOF argument true? Maybe the anonymous voters are just lazy and cast less votes. Finally, there was also the assumption being made that the published voters were less judgmental than their anonymous colleagues (i.e. the public voters would be more likely to vote for a candidate with moral lapses on their resumes than the anonymous voters). This would also fit their characterization as “Liberals.” But are any of these assumptions actually true?

*For the 2023 election, the Baseball Hall of Fame mailed out 405 total ballots. They received back 389 before the January 24th, 2023, deadline.

The Actual Evidence

Interestingly, the results of the 2023 election, split into the 207 public ballots and the 182 anonymous ballots (as of January 24th, 2023), can be analyzed for evidence to support or dispute these assumptions. In the recent election, there were 28 players on the ballot. But 12 of these players, all on the ballot for the 1st time, received either one or no votes. This was their one and only chance to be elected by the BBWAA. For the sake of this discussion, they are no longer relevant. However, the vote totals, published and unpublished, of the other 16 men can be reviewed. Did these 16 players receive the majority of their support from public voters (liberals who believe in modern statistics, an inclusive HOF, and will forgive moral lapses) or from the anonymous voters (conservatives who believe in traditional statistics, a limited HOF, and will not forgive scandal)? One thing is undisputed. In 2023, the anonymous voters, as usual in the previous elections counted by the Baseball HOF Tracker, voted far less than the public voters. To be precise, the 16 candidates under discussion here lost an average of 12.56% from their HOF Tracker vote percentage once all the anonymous ballots were counted.* In other words, it could be argued that if a player fades by less than 12.56%, they may have more support from the anonymous voters than the public ones. Or perhaps not. In any event, the breakdowns between the public and the anonymous votes for all 16 of the players (who lived to possibly be elected by the BBWAA another day) are listed below in order of their vote totals. Also, there is a brief discussion of each player’s Hall of Fame results, trends, and eventual chance to be elected (except for Scott Rolen, who is now in forever).

*16 total players; 1285 public votes on 2070 ballot spaces [10×207); and 988 anonymous votes on 1820 ballot spaces (10×182).

The 2023 Ballot Survivors

1) Scott Rolen: got 297 of the 389 total votes cast [76.3%] in the Baseball Hall of Fame 2023 election; receiving 167 of the 207 total public votes counted by the Tracker before the election [80.7%]; and then getting 130 of 182 Residual votes uncounted by the Tracker [71.4%]. The threshold for election to the Hall was 292 votes [75%]. Scott Rolen was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame by four votes. This was his 6th year on the BBWAA ballot (which will very happily be his last). His candidacy was supported more by modern statistical analysis (70.1 WAR with outstanding fielding metrics) than by traditional statistics. But Rolen’s traditional stats were not completely lacking either. By every account, Scott Rolen is a good and upstanding citizen so there were no moral lapses to impede his candidacy. His vote percentage did recede when the anonymous ballots came in, but not too badly (just 9.3% rather than the 2023 average of 12.6%). The evidence seems to support the argument that Rolen lost some of the anonymous voters simply because they did not find him qualified [i.e the “Small Hall” voters]. But that should have been their only problem with him. That said, it should be noted that, if the public voters had voted at the same percentages that the anonymous ones did, Scott Rolen would still be waiting outside the Baseball Hall of Fame cathedral in 2023 [Path 2018-2023: 1-10.2%; 2-17.2%; 3-35.3%; 4-52.9%; 5-63.2%; 6-76.3% Elected].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Baseball_Hall_of_Fame_balloting

[Path 201x-2023: 1-%; 2-%; 3-%; 4-%; 5-%; 6-%; 7-%; 8-%; 9-%; 10-%].

2) Todd Helton: 281/389 [72.2%]; Tracker 163/207 [78.7%]; Residual 118/182 [64.8%]; 5th year. On the surface, Todd Helton has better traditional statistics than Scott Rolen [G-HR-RBI-BA-SA]. However, Helton lost 13.9% of his votes when the anonymous ballots were counted. Rolen lost just 9.3%. But Helton has warts on his resume that Rolen does not [an unconfirmed steroid rumor and several post career DUIs]. This would seem to confirm the theory that the anonymous voters are more judgmental. Of course, these anonymous voters could also have been devaluing Helton’s career statistics because he played in the offensive pinball park named Coors Field. But that would have been quite modern of them. In any event, Helton is still ahead of Rolen on a year to year basis [in his 5th year, Helton reached 72.2% against Rolen’s 63.2%]. It will be a complete shock if Todd Helton is not elected next year after just missing by a mere eleven votes in 2023 [Path 2019-2023: 1-16.5%; 2-29.2%; 3-44.9%; 4-52.0%; 5-72.2%].

3) Billy Wagner: 265/389 [68.1%]; Tracker 150/207 [72.5%]; Residual 115/182 [63.2%]; 8th year. The HOF support for Billy Wagner actually goes against the conventional wisdom. Modern statistical analysis does not support Wagner’s eventual election at all.* It seems like most of his support should come from the traditional-statistics-loving anonymous voters (“look at all the saves”). But the public voters put Wagner on 9.3% more ballots than the anonymous ones. Wagner had a better than normal fade. This can perhaps be explained away by the “Reliever Conundrum.” For some reason, all BBWAA voters have been bound and determined to elect the best ace relievers to the Baseball Hall of Fame [but no one pushes to elect Manny Mota, arguably the best pinch hitter of all-time]. Wagner has only two years left for the BBWAA to elect him; but he surely has a better than 50-50 chance that he gets honored in either 2024 or 2025 (especially after he jumped 17% this year to 68%). If he does fall off the BBWAA ballot, Wagner will still almost surely eventually be elected. The HOF clean-up Committees do not let players who get over 50% of the BBWAA vote linger in oblivion. It will just take a bit longer. It would be interesting to know how badly Wagner’s brutal post-season record has hurt his candidacy. Billy Wagner was lights out during the regular season but consistently burned his team to the ground whenever the playoffs rolled around. It actually doesn’t seem to have hurt his candidacy at all [Path 2016-2023: 1-10.5%; 2-10.2%; 3-11.1%; 4-16.7%; 5-31.7%; 6-46.7%; 7-51.0%; 8-68.1%].

*Serious Hall of Fame support for non-Ace Relievers players starts at about 50 career Wins Above Replacement [WAR]. Billy Wagner, like most relievers, is no where in that vicinity. He had just 27.7 career WAR.

4) Andruw Jones: 226/389 [58.1%]; Tracker 138/207 [66.7%]; Residual 88/182 [48.4%]; 6th year. The fall off [18.3%] from public voters to anonymous voters for Andruw Jones is right in line with the argument that public voters support modern statistics over traditional (he has great fielding metrics but his career batting average was just .254) and are less judgmental (a strip club scandal in his 20s and getting so out of shape in his 30s that his career effectively ended at the age of 30). There is probably a better than 50-50 chance that Jones is elected by the BBWAA before his eligibility runs out. He has four more years to get that last 17% he needs. But, if he doesn’t make it through the BBWAA, Jones will probably eventually get in through some HOF clean-up Committee just like Billy Wagner. However, Jones wait might be considerably longer. All HOF Committees seem to be conservative and judgmental. That 18.3 percent fade seems to indicate that there will be a rougher road for him if his election gets left up to some future HOF Committee [Path 2018-2023: 1-7.3%; 2-7.5%; 3-19.4%; 4-33.9%; 5-41.4%; 6-58.1%].

5) Gary Sheffield: 214/389 [55.0%]; Tracker 130/207 [62.8%]; Residual 84/182 [46.2%]; 9th year. In this Blog’s previous post, it was asserted that Sheffield would probably eventually get into the Hall of Fame. That may have been a bit pre-mature. Sheffield had a steep 16.6 percent drop-off from the public voters to the anonymous ones. Unlike Helton, Sheffield’s involvement in the steroid scandals was more than just a rumor. Sheffield’s claim that he did not know that he was applying a steroid cream to his knees is somewhat sketchy. On the other hand, in this country, you are presumably innocent until proven guilty (though modern social media has stood this formula on its head), and there has been no other damning evidence. With only one year of eligibility remaining, Gary Sheffield has a slim chance of being elected by the BBWAA.* And when you say slim, it is totally anorexic. Sheffield needs 20% more votes for his last year. In his first nine years, his best yearly percentage increase was just 16.9%. It looks pretty grim actually. After that he will be in front of some future HOF clean-up Committee that may just dismiss him outright like Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens were this year. There is a very good chance that he slips into Baseball Hall of Fame purgatory after the 2024 BBWAA HOF election ends [Path 2015-2023: 1-11.7%; 2-11.6%; 3-13.3%; 4-11.1%; 5-13.6%; 6-30.5%; 7-40.6%; 8-40.6%; 9-55.0%].

*Has there ever been a BBWAA path as strange as Sheffield’s track? 5 straight elections of basically absolutely no movement, two big jumps, then another year of exactly the same percentage, followed by another big jump. Jeff Kent’s weird path may be close.

6t) Carlos Beltran: 181/389 [46.5%]; Tracker 111/207 [53.6%]; Residual 70/182 [38.5%]; 1st year. The election of Beltran to the Baseball Hall of Fame by the BBWAA is inevitable. It is just a question of how long it will take. In this, his first year, the anonymous (presumably more judgmental) voters docked him just 15.1% compared to the public voters. Hardly much more than the usual 12.6% fadeaway. This is presumably an indication (and not a really loud one) that the more conservative voters are holding Beltan accountable for his role in the Houston Astros 2017-2018 sign stealing scandal. But stealing signs is a crime as old as the game of baseball itself. This off-season, the rehabilitation of Beltran continued with his hiring by the New York Mets (the team that fired him when the scandal erupted). Has any player ever gotten 46.5% of the vote by the BBWAA in their 1st year and then never made it into the Hall of Fame? Beltran could be elected next year. However, it seems more likely that Beltran gets to the verge and then is elected in 2025 [Path 2023: 1-46.5%].

6t) Jeff Kent: 181/389 [46.5%]; Tracker 107/207 [51.7%]; Residual 74/182 [40.7%]; 10th and final year. The anonymous BBWAA voters cast their ballots for Jeff Kent at a rate 11.0% under the public BBWAA voters. This is probably completely due to the Small Hall convictions of the anonymous voters. In any event, Kent’s election is now out of the BBWAA hands. He will soon appear in front of a HOF Veteran’s Committee. His chances of being elected by a Hall of Fame by one of these Committees (eventually) is probably assured. Jeff Kent (all-time leader in Home Runs by a second baseman) seems exactly the type of player one of these Fred McGriff (almost 500 home runs) and Harold Baines (almost 3000 hits) loving Baseball Hall of Fame sub-committees can really get behind [End of Path 2014-2023: 1-15.2%; 2-14.0%; 3-16.6%; 4-16.7%; 5-14.5%; 6-18.1%; 7-27.5%; 8-32.4%; 9-32.7%; 10-46.5%].

8) Alex Rodriguez: 139/389 [35.7%]; Tracker 80/207 [38.6%]; Residual 59/182 [32.4%]; 2nd year. Rodriguez has probably no chance of ever getting into the Hall of Fame through a BBWAA vote [and probably probably should not even be included in that sentence]. His multitude of proven beyond a doubt steroid scandals (and allegations of even more) plus his extensive attempts to cover up his crimes will always be an anchor dragging his candidacy down into the depths. Like Bobby Bonds & Roger Clemens before him, the only question of A-Rod’s candidacy is whether he will get close to the 75% threshold required for election. It will be interesting to see if Rodriguez can surpass either Bonds or Clemens final (and highest) vote totals [66.0% and 65.2% respectively]. If he does, it will be a disgrace. His sins are far greater than anything that they ever did. Unlike them, A-Rod actually failed mandated steroid tests, and then he lied and scammed to cover up his sins. Strangely, A-Rod lost only 6.2% of his vote in 2023 when the anonymous votes were counted. This is probably because the Small Hall argument does not apply to him at all. Rodriguez was (absent the proven allegations of steroids) an inner-circle small Hall of Famer already. In other words, his slight decrease must all be due to the anonymous voters being judgmental [Path 2012-2023: 1-34.3%; 2-35.7%].

9) Manny Ramirez: 129/389 [33.2%]; Tracker 76/207 [36.7%]; Residual 53/182 [29.1%]; 7th year. In many ways, the results of the 2023 BBWAA Hall of Fame for Ramirez simply duplicated the outcome of the election for Alex Rodriguez. The percentage of anonymous voters casting their ballots for Ramirez against the percentage by the public voters went down by just 7.6% (compared to the 6.2% lost by Rodrigues). Assuming that all the voters (anonymous and public) also considered Ramirez an inner-circle Hall of Famer, these percentages must just represent the basic debit for coming to the election with a serious stain on your reputation. In other words, the “Small Hall Argument” does not even apply. That being said, there is a huge difference in value between these two players. Baseball players need to play defense too. A-Rod’s good to great defense at shortstop and third base was much more valuable than Ramirez’s “wandering-in-the-desert” outfield play. In fact, modern statistical analysis basically values Rodriguez as almost twice the player that Ramirez used to be. Of course, this is reflected by the fact that Rodriguez, only in his second year, is ahead of Ramirez, who is in his 7th. Regardless of this, both players are on a rocket ride to nowhere. They will eventually fall totally off the BBWAA ballot and into Baseball Hall of Fame Veterans-type Committee oblivion. Just three more until Ramirez is cast into the outer darkness [Path 2017-2023: 1-23.8%; 2-22.0%; 3-22.8%; 4-28.2%; 5-28.2%; 6-28.9%; 7-33.2%].

10) Omar Vizquel: 76/389 [19.5%]; Tracker 17/207 [8.2%]; Residual 59/182 [32.4%]; 6th year. The difference in the public and the anonymous results for Vizquel is pretty startling. Rather than fading by the usual 10 percent (or so) between the known and the unknown, Vizquel surged by 24.2%. Some of the anonymous surge is certainly because public voters are more likely to believe that Vizquel is not statistically worthy. Traditional voters, who probably make up most of the Vizquel supporters, are more likely anonymous. But this is not really a baseball result but a cultural one. Currently, there is a large and quite vociferous cultural movement [the so-called Me Too Movement] that believes that any claim against a man for being abusive should be treated as true until disproved [the complete opposite of: innocent until proven guilty]. So there is a pressure on anyone who posts their ballot publicly that does not exist at all for the anonymous voter. Why take abuse when you don’t have to, especially for a candidate right on the line like Vizquel? All this being said, the evidence that Vizquel physically abused his now former wife and also sexually harassed a bat bay is pretty damning. There is a good argument that it would be much more prudent to wait and see if the allegations are proven or not (or perhaps even multiply). In the previous post, it was stated that Vizquel looked like he might fall below the 5% threshold for remaining on the 2024 ballot. That may have been the worst prediction in that post. The anonymous surge took him safely out of the danger zone. But his election by the BBWAA is still doomed. Like the steroid guys, Vizquel has been left to take up space on the ballot and twist in the wind until his ten years of eligibility are up [four years to go]; and then he will fall into Veterans Committee oblivion. However, if this 2023 Hall of Fame election showed anything, it demonstrated that there is obviously a anonymous core of support for Vizquel well north of the five percent needed to keep him on the ballot until his 10 years are finally up. [Path 2018-2023: 1-37.0%, 2-42.5%, 3-52.6%, 4-49.1%, 5-23.9%, 6-19.5%.]

11) Andy Pettitte: 66/389 [17.0%]; Tracker 35/207 [16.9%], Residual 31/182 [17.0%]; 5th year. The candidacy of Andy Pettitte is a puzzle. The support for Pettitte is equally distributed between the public and anonymous voters. But, since there was no fade, it could be argued that the more progressive public voters are less committed to Pettitte than the more conservative anonymous voters. His admission that he used Human Growth Hormone [HGH] is pretty obviously being held against him almost equally. Like Mark McGwire, Pettitte has the arguments of transparency and accountability going for him. He did not deny or lie about taking HGH. He was doing it for what would be, in the real world, a noble purpose. He took HGH to help recover from injury so that he could: 1) help his team and 2) earn the salary that he was being paid. But this doesn’t seem to be helping him at all. Neither does being a Yankee and having a pretty stellar post-season career. Pettitte seems to have the mix of qualifications that would appeal to both progressive and conservative voters. His lack of support is really a mystery. Pettitte should, at the very least, have the same support as Rodriguez and Ramirez, both know steroid users (and, in Arod’s case, a history of denial and lying and and other nefarious actions that probably should outright disqualify him). In 2023, Pettitte did finish with his highest percentage yet. However, this is may just be due to spots opening up on BBWAA ballots because of all the players who dropped off the ballot after the 2022 election. The theory would be that these dropouts (Pettitte friend & source of pain Roger Clemens and others) leaving freed up their spots for a borderline candidate like Pettitte [Path: 1-9.9%, 2-11.3%, 3-13.7%, 4-10.7%, 5-17.0%]

12) Bobby Abreu: 60/389 [15.4%]; Tracker 38/207 [18.4%]; Residual 22/182 [12.1%]; 4th year. Public voters gave Bobby Abreu 6.3% more love than their anonymous counterparts. Under the theory that public voters believe more strongly in modern statistical analysis than their anonymous peers, this makes complete sense. Abreu is possibly the quintessential modern statistical player. He was never the best player in the league (or probably on his team). Abreu didn’t lead the League in any of the flashy categories [HR-RBI-BA etc]. He did do the underrated things, including drawing an absolute ton of walks. If there ever was a star baseball player who faded into the scenery to the extent that Bobby Abreu did, the search party has not located him yet. Despite all this, he forged a respectable Hall of Fame claim through modern measurements. It is said that: the furrther into the past the memory of a player’s career goes, the more the statistics matter. If that is true, Abreu’s vote totals should continue to increase. But, if the pace doesn’t pick up soon, Abreu will simply run out of time for his election (at least by the BBWAA). The most likely outcome seems to be that his vote total will continue to increase (perhaps into 30-40 percent land). But eventually Abreu will be lost in the Baseball HOF Committee forest [Path 2020-2023: 1-5.5%; 2-8.7%; 3-8.6%; 4-15.4%].

13) Jimmy Rollins: 50/389 [12.9%]; Tracker 25/207 [12.1%]; Residual 25/182 [13.7%]; 2nd year. Anonymous voters favored Rollins by 1.6% over their more public brethren. By modern statistical analysis, Rollins is just a borderline Hall of Fame candidate. However, to a voter relying more on traditional methods, Jimmy Rollins looks quite a bit better than that. He had a long career and he accumulated good counting stats. His actual offensive prowess was reduced by his reluctance to accept a base on balls. Rollins played shortstop well but was not among the very top fielders at his position. Rollins had a very good and valuable peak. He won the MVP award in 2007 when he knocked out 38 doubles, 20 triples, and 30 home runs while playing all 162 games. But, aside from his 2004-2008 peak, he was often just an average player. When he won his MVP award, Wins Above Replacement actually rated him as the ninth best player in the League. Rollins led his league four times in triples, once in runs scored, and once in stolen bases. He was very durable. He played on various contending teams and one World Series winner. All in all, his career ended in the gray area between the actual Hall of Fame and the Hall of almost Famous enough players. Interestingly, Rollins has one thing in common with the other three guys on the bottom of the 2023 election results (players 13 through 16). They all had more support from the anonymous voters than the public voters. Whether he will continue to languish down near the bottom, fall off the ballot entirely, or begin to rise up is unknown. If pressed for a prediction, this blog believes he will rise but never get over 50 percent [Path 2022-2023: 1-9.4%; 2-12.9%].

14t) Mark Buehrle: 42/389 [10.8%]; Tracker 21/207 [10.1%]; Residual 21/182 [11.5%]; 3rd year. Like the rest of the players on the bottom of the list, Mark Buehrle received more votes from the anonymous voters (by 1.4%). Buehrle rebounded nicely from damn near falling completely off the ballot in 2021. His fall from an initial 11.0% to 5.8% in his second year with a nice rebound to 10.8% this year (it seems to indicate that Buehrle may have been the last man on a multitude of ballots (i.e. listed 10th or 11th). Whatever the reason, it is good to see him survive to possibly be elected another day. In many ways, he is the pitching equivalent of Bobby Abreu. Buehrle was competent and very valuable but he was not flashy at all. He pounded the strike zone and did not beat himself. His early retirement ensured that he had no chance to pile up more statistics and make his Hall of Fame argument stronger. But it should already be strong enough. Like Abreu, Buehrle’s lack of pizzazz is probably going to keep his vote totals from rising very far. It’s a shame [Path 2021-2023: 1-11.0%; 2-5.8%; 3-10.8%].

14t) Francisco Rodriguez: 42/389 [10.8%]; Tracker 20/207 [9.7%]; Residual 22/182 [12.1%]; 1st year. In his first year, Billy Wagner received 10.5% of the vote. His vote totals didn’t even really start to rise up until his fourth year on the ballot [Of course, a bunch of unelected steroid abusers were clogging it up]. Now, eight years later, Wagner is on the verge of being elected [with a 68.1% share]. In his first year, Rodriguez got 10.5% of the vote, doing slightly better than Wagner. Just looking at their traditional statistics as ace relievers, Wagner doesn’t really look all that better than Rodriguez.* And Rodriguez is basically the “Roger Maris” of ace relievers, holding the single season record for saves with 62 in 2008. If Wagner gets elected, the candidacy of Rodriguez will almost surely get a large boost because of their obvious similarities. On the other hand, Wagner was pretty clearly the better pitcher over his career if one analyses his statistics closely (in the regular season). The prediction here is that Francisco Rodriguez has just begun a long and productive run on the BBWAA Baseball Hall of Fame ballots. He will probably either get real close or set himself up for eventual Committee selection for election. Like the rest of the candidates at the bottom of the ballot, Rodriguez got a greater share of the anonymous vote [Path 2023: 1-10.8%].

*Rodriguez: 52-53 W-L, 948 games, 976.0 IP, 1142 SO, 2.86 ERA and 437 saves vs. Wagner: 47-40 W-L, 853 games, 903.0 IP, 1196 SO, 2.31 ERA and 422 saves.

16) Torii Hunter: 27/389 [6.9%]; Tracker 7/207 [3.4%]; Residual 20/182 [11.0%]; 3rd year. Torii Hunter’s candidacy was saved by the 2023 anonymous BBWAA voters to once again grace the ballot next year. If left up to the public BBWAA members, Hunter would have sent packing (their 3.4% was slightly under the 5.0% required to survive). However, the anonymous BBWAA members voted at a rate of 11.0% for Hunter. Only Omar Vizquel, for obvious reasons, had a greater positive differential [24.2%] than Hunter [7.6%] between votes cast by the unknown and the identified. The next largest percentage in favor of the anonymous over the public votes was just 2.4%. So the obvious question is: What do the anonymous voters see in Torii Hunter to make them vote for him at a rate three times greater than the public voters? Using modern statistical analysis, Hunter is a borderline Baseball Hall of Famer. It can be argued that his traditional statistics make a better HOF case for him (his main weakness was that not walking much). Hunter certainly was famous enough and also had the requisite charisma to appeal to the less numerically obsessed. Even though his (probably) most famous play was a failure, Hunter would have to be given credit for the extreme effort.* But, realistically, this large difference in support between anonymous and public voters seems inexplicable. Maybe it is just random. He had only 7 public voters who believed in his candidacy against 20 anonymous ones. But just 27 total votes total is hardly a majority that speaks with great authority. Perhaps current Torii Hunter HOF supporters simply prefer anonymity. Who knows? It will be very interesting to see if this pattern holds from year to year [Path 2021-2023: 1-9.5%; 2-5.3%; 3-6.9%].

*In the 2nd game of the 2013 American League Championship Series, Hunter flipped completely over the low wall separating left field from the bullpen in Fenway Park while chasing a David Ortiz grand slam home run. It was epic.

Closing Observations: The Attendants

So what conclusions (if any) can be drawn from looking at and analyzing the public versus the anonymous votes in the 2023 BBWAA Baseball Hall of Fame election? In general, there seem to be 3 distinct classes of candidates. The class with lowest vote totals could be called the “Attendants.” These players could be said to be in the Hall of Fame “waiting room” (so to speak). Oddly, the one thing that all the Attendant HOF cases currently have in common is that more of the private voters are in favor (percentage-wise, at least) of their candidacies. This is quite strange. All of the other candidates, with one very unique exception, received much more support from public voters rather than anonymous ones. It almost seems like the public voters have not yet actually considered the Attendants. Of the 16 surviving candidates, 5 can be classified as Attendants. In order of their anonymous versus public percentages, they are: 1. Torii Hunter [+7.6%]; 2. Francisco Rodriguez [+2.4%]; 3. Jimmy Rollins [+1.6%]; 4. Mark Buehrle [+1.4%]; and 5. Andy Pettitte [+0.1%]. By total votes in the 2023 BBWAA election, they finished 11th [Pettite] and 13 through 16th of the 16 total candidates. The Attendants seem to be just waiting for their HOF cases to be noticed by the public voters and catch fire. The Attendant with the greatest chance of igniting in 2024 is probably Francisco Rodriguez. It will be interesting to see, if his candidacy rises, whether it is fueled mostly by the public voters beginning to consider him more closely.

Closing Observations: The Exiles

The second class, the 3 players with the the 8th through 10th vote totals in the 2023 BBWAA Hall of Fame election, could be called the “Exiles.” These 3 candidates could be said to be completely outside the HOF Arena. But some of the crowd are throwing them bouquets over the walls. Because they were caught and suspended during their careers for using steroids, Alex Rodriguez and Manny Ramirez are simply marking time on the ballot. Perhaps they will get another chance in some distant future [when steroids have been proven not to enhance performance and carbohydrates shown to make you skinny]. The one fascinating aspect of looking at their public and anonymous votes is that the private voters were actually not much more judgmental than those voters who published (just 6 to 7 percent worse). Since neither player should have been affected by “Small Hall Syndrome” at all, anonymous voters barely held more of a grudge against them than public voters did. It seems like they have a core of support unaffected by known or unknown votes. Not that it will help them any. There is obviously also a core of non-supporters, greater than 25%, which will always block their election. There is also one other guy in the Exiles: Omar Vizquel. But he is a complete unicorn. Supported by just 8.2% of the public voters but a whooping 32.4% of the private voters, there is no one else like him on the ballot. Evidently, Vizquel (like Ramirez and A-Rod) has a core of supporters, no animosity of the anonymous there, that will keep him on the ballot until the clock runs out. But there also seems to be a large group of non-supporters, who do not condone wife beating or autistic people molesting, that will always block him. The Baseball Hall of Fame’s decision to let these 3 candidates twist in the wind for ten years almost seems like a form of added punishment, a type of mental torture.

Closing Observations: The Contenders

The final class of 2023 BBWAA Baseball HOF candidates should be called the “Contenders.” These are the players whose HOF cases are really currently in play by the BBWAA. They are (or they were in the case of Jeff Kent) all making progress every election towards being elected. It could be said that they are in the Arena. The top 7 vote getters in the 2023 BBWAA HOF election were all in the class of Contenders. Each of these players has greater support from the public voters than the anonymous ones [at least 9.3% more support]. This is a complete reversal from the Attendants, the candidates who are on the bottom of the list. This indicates that the public voters are the engine that drives the BBWAA vote. In other words, a BBWAA HOF candidate will rise to the top of the election when the public voters take his HOF case seriously and begin to vote for him. It remains to be seen whether the anonymous voters are swept along in the wake of this phenomenon. It will be very interesting to see if the gap between the public and private voters closes next year for Andruw Jones. If it does, this would almost certainly mean that the private voters are leading the charge with the anonymous voters following along afterwards. If it does not close, this would indicate that the private voters are resisting the choices of the public voters (and not buying into Jones’s marvelous fielding metrics). These 7 Contenders, in order of the smallest percentage difference between their public and their private vote percentages, are: 1t. Scott Rolen [9.3%]; 1t. Billy Wagner [9.3%]; 3. Jeff Kent [11%]; 4. Todd Helton [13.9%]; 5. new to ballot Carlos Beltran [15.1%]; 6. Gary Sheffield [16.6%]; and 7) Andruw Jones [18.3%]. Whether a high difference [Jones/18.3%] or a low difference [Wagner/9.3%] is more advantageous in the next election will (hopefully) be revealed in 2024.

Closing Observations: Next Year and Future Posts

There is one more player among the remaining 16 active HOF candidates who was not discussed above: Bobby Abreu. He finished 12th in the 2023 BBWAA election. Unlike the other bottom of the ballot finishers (#11-16), Abreu did not receive more anonymous votes than public ones. In fact, Abreu had 6.3% more public supporters than private ones. Was this the start of Abreu’s rise in the HOF ballot as the public voters begin to scrutinize his case? There is a lot to like in Abreu’s career. But it is hidden behind a uncontroversial and quiet façade. Have the public voters finally begun to notice that he is actually quite worthy? If this is true, Bobby Abreu has now joined the “Contenders” and his vote total should jump in 2024. It will be something to watch closely in 2024. Of course, everything discussed above is all about the inner workings of the BBWAA HOF election process. But it doesn’t address the larger issues at all. One of these issues [Why is the BBWAA HOF election structured as it is and can it not be improved?] will be analyzed in the next post on the Hall of Fame [Part 2]. After looking at that, the even bigger picture [How can the entire Hall of Fame process be improved?] will be addressed [Part 3].

Addendum #1

One of these things (well two actually) is not like the others: Public Votes- Abreu 38, Pettitte 35, Rollins 25, Buehrle 21, Rodriguez 20, Hunter 7. Private Votes- Pettite 31, Rollins 25, Abreu 22, Rodriguez 22, Buehrle 21, Hunter 20.

Post #25

2023 Franchise Review [Number 1]: Los Angeles Dodgers (2022 Record: 111-51)

January 25, 2023

One of these things is not like the others. One of these things just doesn’t belong – Jay Asher

Part A: The Unique 2022 Los Angeles Dodgers

A common cognitive puzzle is to pick out what makes something in a series different from all the other selections. For example, which of these 4 states does not belong in this list: Alaska, Connecticut, Minnesota, and Ohio? Two obvious answers would be: 1) Alaska because it is not part of the Continental United States or 2) Connecticut because it does not end with a consonant like the other choices. The 2022 Los Angeles Dodgers, who won 111 games and lost only 51, are an example of this type of mental enigma. The 111 victories are tied for 4th on the all-time list with the 1954 Cleveland Indians [111-43]. Since Major League Baseball began in 1871, only 3 teams have ever won more games in a single season: the 1906 Chicago Cubs [116-36]; the 2001 Seattle Mariners [116-46]; and the 1998 New York Yankees [114-48]. Of course, there are quite a few other teams that have come close to 111 victories in a season: the 1909 Pittsburgh Pirates [110-42]; the 1927 New York Yankees [110-44]; the 1961 New York Yankees [109-53]; the 1969 Baltimore Orioles [109-53]; and the 1970 Baltimore Orioles, the 1975 Cincinnati Reds, the 1986 New York Mets, & the 2018 Boston Red Sox [all with a 108-54 record]. Another five teams have won 107 games [including the 2019 Houston Astros & the 2021 San Francisco Giants], seven more won 106 [including the 2019 & 2021 Los Angles Dodgers plus the 2022 Houston Astros], and yet another 5 finished with 105 triumphs. So what makes this 2022 Los Angeles Dodgers team so different from all the other super-teams that won well in excess of 100 games during a season?

The 2019-2022 Los Angeles Dodgers Super-Team Streak

For one thing, the 2021 Los Angeles Dodgers club went 106-56. In the entire history of the Major Leagues, no team has ever won that many games in one season and then improved in the next. But the 2022 Dodgers did, going 111-51, and improving by 5 whole games. More interestingly, it could be argued that these Dodgers were the only 100+ wins super-team that was just having a regular year. The Dodgers won 106 games in 2019 and 2021. In the Co-vid pandemic shortened 2020 season, the Dodgers went 43-17. At that pace, the 2020 Dodgers would have finished with a 116-46 record. In other words, the Dodgers, from 2019 to 2022, could have finished with 106-116-106-111 wins. The Dodger’s great 2022 season of 111 wins may not have been a peak year at all. It could have been just a fluctuation in the team’s normal talent level. The 2022 Los Angles Dodgers, with just a little luck, could have been an even better team than they were. Trevor Bauer, arguably the team’s best pitcher, was suspended for the entire 2022 season after his predilection for beating up women was revealed. Walker Buehler, probably the team’s 2nd best pitcher, did not pitch up to his 2021 standard. His 2022 season ended on June 10th with a sore elbow that resulted in his 2nd Tommy John surgery. Buehler will not return until 2024. Several regulars had off-years. Max Muncy fell from 36-94-.249-.527 (HR-RBI-BA-SA) to 21-69-.196-.384. Chris Taylor went from 20-73-.254-.438 to 10-43-.221-.373. Justin Turner went from 27-87-.278-.471 to 13-81-.278-.431. No player had a career year. The 2022 Dodgers did add the excellent Freddie Freeman and serviceable closer Craig Kimbrel as free agents. But they also lost Corey Seager and even better closer Kenley Jansen to free agency. On the bright side, center fielder Cody Bellinger went from brutally awful with the bat in 2021 to just terrible in 2022; and Mookie Betts was, once again, Mookie Betts. So why were the 2022 Los Angeles Dodgers five games better than their 2021 team?

Probably the best answer to that question is that a bunch of arbitrary pitchers (Tyler Anderson, Tony Gonsolin, and Andrew Heaney) performed much better than expected. But this was just random luck. The 2022 Dodgers, as a whole, were no better than their 2021 squad. Every other 100+ win super-team was surely peaking (possibly excepting the 1969-1970 Baltimore Orioles). Perhaps the best historical comparison for the 2019-2022 Los Angeles Dodgers super-team run is the 1906-1910 Chicago Cubs.* From 1902-1905, the Cubs steadily improved with 68-69, 82-56, 93-60, and 92-61 records [the Dodgers went 92-70 in 2018 but had won 90 or more games every year from 2013-2018 with a peak 104 win year in 2017]. The Cubs improvement could be traced directly to Frank Selee, their manager [elected to the Hall of Fame in 1999]. Hired in 1902, the no-nonsense Selee led the Cubs until stepping down due to illness during the 1905 season [and passed away in 1909]. Frank Chance, the Cubs star first baseman, replaced Selee as the manager. The 1905 Cubs performed better under their new manager, and then exploded on the National League in 1906 with a 116-36 record. The primary factors behind the increase from 92 victories in 1905 to 116 wins in 1906 were: 1) the maturation of Mordecai “Three Finger” Brown into a superstar; 2) a deep pitching staff that got even better; 3) the acquisition of two stars, Harry Steinfeldt and Jimmy Sheckard; 4) career years from Frank Chance and new acquisition Steinfeldt; and 5) great or good years from everyone else. After their 1906 peak, the Cubs remained an excellent team from 1907-1910: finishing 107-45, 99-55, 104-49, and 104-50. Then the Cubs, from 1911 to 1915, began a slow decline towards mediocrity (92-62, 91-59, 88-65, 78-76, and 73-80). Will the 2023 Los Angeles Dodgers team fall off this same precipice, or will they be able to continue to win 100 or more games per season?

*If they had won 116 games in 2020, the LA Dodgers would hold the record for most victories over four seasons with 439. Without really checking, the second best total would almost surely have been the 1906-1909 Cubs with 426 wins.

Rebuilding on the Fly

For the 2023 season, the Los Angeles Dodgers are attempting to rebuild their club on the fly. They released the repellent Trevor Bauer, despite having him under contract for 2023, while still owing him over 22 million dollars. The club replaced star free agent shortstop Trea Turner with the stopgap Miguel Rojas. They let the struggling Cody Bellinger and aging Justin Turner leave; and then signed the aging and struggling J.D. Martinez. The Dodger’s two lottery ticket winner pitchers, Tyler Anderson and Andrew Heaney, cashed in their winnings by signing elsewhere. Craig Kimbrel and Chris Martin were allowed to wander off. The Dodgers practiced addition by subtraction by letting David Price and Joey Gallo go. In the end, nine 2022 Los Angeles Dodger pitchers and players signed contracts worth over 10+ million dollars annually with other teams for the 2023 season. The Dodgers did resign their long-time ace pitcher Clayton Kershaw and purchased two new lottery ticket pitchers, Noah Syndergaard & Shelby Miller. And the club has stated that it wants to let some rookies have an opportunity to shine. Of course, this will help the 2023 Dodgers get under the luxury tax threshold and reset the penalties to a lower level for when they once again violate it (if they ever do). If all goes right and the team peaks, the 2023 Los Angeles Dodgers could win 100 or more games again: Mookie Betts has an MVP season; Gavin Lux becomes a star player; Max Muncy bombs 40 home runs; Freddie Freeman continues to be himself; Will Smith has a career year; Noah Syndergaard and Shelby Miller punch their own lottery tickets, etc. etc. But the much more likely scenario is that some players have good years and other players do not. It looks the Dodger super-team streak will reset.

2023 Los Angeles Dodgers Prediction: 90-95 wins [not bad for a reset].

Part B: Where is the Big Bopper?

The Los Angeles Dodgers’ franchise has never had a player hit 50 (or more) home runs in a season. Of course, many teams can claim this dubious honor. But the Dodgers are the National league equivalent of the New York Yankees and they used to play in a bandbox named Ebbets Field.* The Yankees have, of course, had multiple players whack 50 plus home runs in a single year. The very first Dodger to hit 40 home runs was Gil Hodges in 1951 (with exactly 40, breaking Babe Herman’s 1930 team record of 35). Hodges was one of three Boys of Summer Brooklyn Dodgers to hit more than 40 in a season before the club moved to Los Angeles [Hodges: 40 in 1951 & 42 in 1954; Duke Snider: 42 in 1953, 40 in 1954, 42 in 1955, 43 in 1956, and then 40 more in 1957; and the great catcher Roy Campanella with 41 in 1953]. Snider’s 43 home run in 1956 remained the club record for a very long time. In 1997, Mike Piazza hit exactly 40 bombs to become the first Dodger to reach that threshold since the 1950s. Then, in 2000, the great but peripatetic slugger Gary Sheffield tied the Dodger record with 43 taters of his own. The very next year, 2001 the long & lanky Shawn Green crushed 49 home runs to break the record. Green followed up with 42 more HRs in 2002 before shoulder issues robbed him of his power. In 2004, Adrian Beltre, having an enormous fluke season, bashed 48 home runs, just falling short of tying Green’s record or even becoming the first Dodger to reach 50 homers. It certainly seemed that the Dodgers would finally get their 50 HR hitter when Cody Bellinger arrived. In 2017, he hit 39 HRs as a 21-year-old rookie. In 2018, he slumped to just 25 Homers. Then Bellinger, now 23-years-old, crushed 47 Home runs, the third most ever hit be a Dodger. Cody seemed sure to eventually break the record. Unfortunately, Bellinger’s career was derailed by shoulder issues, just like Shawn Green (oddly, both men were long & lanky as players). From 2020 to 2022, Bellinger could not even crack 20 home runs in any given year. The Dodgers have finally given up on him, let him go as a free agent. A Dodger hitting 50 HRs in a year will have to wait a while longer.

*Fans of the St. Louis Cardinals may claim, with some justification, to be the National League’s version of the New York Yankees (and their seasonal home run record is, of course, held by Mark McGwire with 70.)

Of course, if history had flowed down a different channel, the Dodgers may have already had a slugger who could have hit 50+ homers for them. From 1958 to 1964, Frank Howard played for the Dodgers. Listed at 6 feet 7 inches tall and 255 pounds, Howard was the Aaron Judge of his time. Playing in the pitching dominated and offensively starved 1960s, Howard played his career at an awful time to hit. The Dodgers, showing no faith in Howard, platooned him from 1960-1964 and then simply traded him away. The Dodger parks did Howard no favors either (from 1958-1964, he hit 55 home HRs versus 68 road HRs). With the Washington Senators, Frank Howard came into his own at last from 1968 to 1970 and hit 44, 48 and 44 home runs before age (he turned 32 in August 1968) and injuries washed his career away. If he had played for the Dodgers in the high-octane 1990s (and not been platooned), Howard would have possibly hit at least 50 home runs six times or more. In context, he was probably the most gifted HR hitter that the Dodgers ever had. Unfortunately, the Dodgers recently had a player under contract who could have given big Frank a tussle for that title. In June of 2016, the Dodgers signed a tall skinny, almost 19-years-old, Cuban refugee named Yordan Alvarez for over 2 million dollars. Two weeks after signing Alvarez, the Dodgers traded him away for a middling Major League relief pitcher to the Houston Astros. Why wasn’t the Astros interest in Alvarez not some sort of indication to the Dodgers that they should have looked twice at Alvarez before trading him? It simply seems very odd. If his knees hold up, it is now very likely that the 6 foot 5 inch and 250 pound Yordan Alvarez will hit 50 or more HRs relatively soon. Meanwhile, the Dodgers still wait patiently for their 50 HR man.

Note: This post was the first of 30 individual team post (in order of 2022 winning percentage) to practice writing shorter blog posts. In that sense, it was an abject failure. Hopefully, practice will make perfect eventually.